On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 10:29:12AM -0700, Xing, Cedric wrote:
> Please note that your patchset hasn't been upstreamed yet. Your Makefile is
> problematic to begin with. Technically it's your job to make it work before
> sending out any patches. You didn't explain what's done for each line of
>
On 7/13/2019 8:15 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Sat, 2019-07-13 at 18:10 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 23:51 -0700, Cedric Xing wrote:
The original x86/sgx/Makefile didn't work when "x86/sgx" was specified as the
test target, nor did it work with "run_tests" as the make
On Sat, 2019-07-13 at 18:10 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 23:51 -0700, Cedric Xing wrote:
> > The original x86/sgx/Makefile didn't work when "x86/sgx" was specified as
> > the
> > test target, nor did it work with "run_tests" as the make target. Yet
> > another
> >
On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 23:51 -0700, Cedric Xing wrote:
> The original x86/sgx/Makefile didn't work when "x86/sgx" was specified as the
> test target, nor did it work with "run_tests" as the make target. Yet another
> problem was that it breaks 32-bit only build. This patch fixes those problems,
>
The original x86/sgx/Makefile didn't work when "x86/sgx" was specified as the
test target, nor did it work with "run_tests" as the make target. Yet another
problem was that it breaks 32-bit only build. This patch fixes those problems,
along with adjustments to compiler/linker options and
5 matches
Mail list logo
