On 2016/3/10 10:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 03/07/2016 06:48 PM, Yongji Xie wrote:
When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, the current
implement reassigns the alignment by changing resources' size
which can potentially break some drivers.
How can this possibly break any
On 2016/3/10 10:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 03/07/2016 06:48 PM, Yongji Xie wrote:
When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, the current
implement reassigns the alignment by changing resources' size
which can potentially break some drivers.
How can this possibly break any
On 03/07/2016 06:48 PM, Yongji Xie wrote:
When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, the current
implement reassigns the alignment by changing resources' size
which can potentially break some drivers.
How can this possibly break any driver?... It rounds up, not down, what do
I miss here?
On 03/07/2016 06:48 PM, Yongji Xie wrote:
When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, the current
implement reassigns the alignment by changing resources' size
which can potentially break some drivers.
How can this possibly break any driver?... It rounds up, not down, what do
I miss here?
When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, the current
implement reassigns the alignment by changing resources' size
which can potentially break some drivers.
So this patch adds a new option "noresize" for the parameter
to solve this problem.
Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie
When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, the current
implement reassigns the alignment by changing resources' size
which can potentially break some drivers.
So this patch adds a new option "noresize" for the parameter
to solve this problem.
Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
