On śro, 2015-01-21 at 16:22 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:47:43PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > This is RFC, please don't apply yet but let me know if this approach
> > is OK.
>
> I just reviewed the patchset. It looks fine to me.
Great!
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:47:43PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> This is RFC, please don't apply yet but let me know if this approach
> is OK.
I just reviewed the patchset. It looks fine to me.
> TLDR
>
> Patchset tries to fix following race scenario:
>
> Thread 1:
On śro, 2015-01-21 at 16:22 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:47:43PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
This is RFC, please don't apply yet but let me know if this approach
is OK.
I just reviewed the patchset. It looks fine to me.
Great! Thanks
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:47:43PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
This is RFC, please don't apply yet but let me know if this approach
is OK.
I just reviewed the patchset. It looks fine to me.
TLDR
Patchset tries to fix following race scenario:
Thread 1: charger
Hi,
This is RFC, please don't apply yet but let me know if this approach
is OK.
TLDR
Patchset tries to fix following race scenario:
Thread 1: charger manager, CONSUMER
Thread 2: power supply driver, PROVIDER
THREAD 1 (charger manager) THREAD 2 (power supply driver)
Hi,
This is RFC, please don't apply yet but let me know if this approach
is OK.
TLDR
Patchset tries to fix following race scenario:
Thread 1: charger manager, CONSUMER
Thread 2: power supply driver, PROVIDER
THREAD 1 (charger manager) THREAD 2 (power supply driver)
6 matches
Mail list logo
