> I think we can't land up here by-passing the check for quirks so above
> checks are duplicated here..
True.
So, as Ben seems OK with write-then-anything, can you send me your
changes as an incremental patch to mine with your Signed-off, please?
Thanks,
Wolfram
signature.asc
I think we can't land up here by-passing the check for quirks so above
checks are duplicated here..
True.
So, as Ben seems OK with write-then-anything, can you send me your
changes as an incremental patch to mine with your Signed-off, please?
Thanks,
Wolfram
signature.asc
Description:
On 03/11/2015 04:42 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 22:43 +0530, Neelesh Gupta wrote:
I tested the i2c opal driver after updating the patch as below.
Basically I think we can also support write-then-{read/write}
for the number of messages = 2.
Ben, any issues if we
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 22:43 +0530, Neelesh Gupta wrote:
> I tested the i2c opal driver after updating the patch as below.
> Basically I think we can also support write-then-{read/write}
> for the number of messages = 2.
> Ben, any issues if we support both write plus read/write in the
> opal
I tested the i2c opal driver after updating the patch as below.
Basically I think we can also support write-then-{read/write}
for the number of messages = 2.
Ben, any issues if we support both write plus read/write in the
opal driver ?
Regards,
Neelesh
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-opal.c | 20
I tested the i2c opal driver after updating the patch as below.
Basically I think we can also support write-then-{read/write}
for the number of messages = 2.
Ben, any issues if we support both write plus read/write in the
opal driver ?
Regards,
Neelesh
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-opal.c | 20
On 03/11/2015 04:42 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 22:43 +0530, Neelesh Gupta wrote:
I tested the i2c opal driver after updating the patch as below.
Basically I think we can also support write-then-{read/write}
for the number of messages = 2.
Ben, any issues if we
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 22:43 +0530, Neelesh Gupta wrote:
I tested the i2c opal driver after updating the patch as below.
Basically I think we can also support write-then-{read/write}
for the number of messages = 2.
Ben, any issues if we support both write plus read/write in the
opal driver ?
From: Wolfram Sang
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-opal.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-opal.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-opal.c
index 16f90b1a750894..b2788ecad5b3cb 100644
---
From: Wolfram Sang wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-opal.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-opal.c
10 matches
Mail list logo
