On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:56:04PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:55:05PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 02/19/16 13:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I think the \n\t is unnecessary.
> > >
> > > Super! I wonder if we we can just use this on s390 as well
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:56:04PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:55:05PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 02/19/16 13:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I think the \n\t is unnecessary.
> > >
> > > Super! I wonder if we we can just use this on s390 as well
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:55:05PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/19/16 13:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the \n\t is unnecessary.
> >
> > Super! I wonder if we we can just use this on s390 as well without it
> > pooping?
> > I ask as this would set a precedent.
> >
>
>
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:55:05PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/19/16 13:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the \n\t is unnecessary.
> >
> > Super! I wonder if we we can just use this on s390 as well without it
> > pooping?
> > I ask as this would set a precedent.
> >
>
>
On 02/19/16 13:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> I think the \n\t is unnecessary.
>
> Super! I wonder if we we can just use this on s390 as well without it pooping?
> I ask as this would set a precedent.
>
Ask Heike, but I think just ; or \n ought be be fine. I do not know of
*any* case where
On 02/19/16 13:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> I think the \n\t is unnecessary.
>
> Super! I wonder if we we can just use this on s390 as well without it pooping?
> I ask as this would set a precedent.
>
Ask Heike, but I think just ; or \n ought be be fine. I do not know of
*any* case where
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:26:51PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/19/2016 05:45 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > With a generic linker tables solution in place we
> > need a general asm solution for declaring entries
> > with asm. The first easy target is to cover the C
> > asm declarations,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:26:51PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/19/2016 05:45 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > With a generic linker tables solution in place we
> > need a general asm solution for declaring entries
> > with asm. The first easy target is to cover the C
> > asm declarations,
On 02/19/2016 05:45 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> With a generic linker tables solution in place we
> need a general asm solution for declaring entries
> with asm. The first easy target is to cover the C
> asm declarations, guard the header file for now
> and define a first generic entry
On 02/19/2016 05:45 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> With a generic linker tables solution in place we
> need a general asm solution for declaring entries
> with asm. The first easy target is to cover the C
> asm declarations, guard the header file for now
> and define a first generic entry
With a generic linker tables solution in place we
need a general asm solution for declaring entries
with asm. The first easy target is to cover the C
asm declarations, guard the header file for now
and define a first generic entry push_section_tbl()
to be used later for custom linker table
With a generic linker tables solution in place we
need a general asm solution for declaring entries
with asm. The first easy target is to cover the C
asm declarations, guard the header file for now
and define a first generic entry push_section_tbl()
to be used later for custom linker table
12 matches
Mail list logo
