Re: [RFC v5 00/11] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization

Hi Smitha, 2017-11-20 Smitha T Murthy : > Hi Gustavo, > > I am currently referring to your implementation for explicit > synchronisation. For the same I needed your testapp, but I am unable > to download the same at the link provided >

Re: [RFC v5 00/11] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization

Hi Smitha, 2017-11-20 Smitha T Murthy : > Hi Gustavo, > > I am currently referring to your implementation for explicit > synchronisation. For the same I needed your testapp, but I am unable > to download the same at the link provided > “https://gitlab.collabora.com/padovan/v4l2-fences-test” >

Re: [RFC v5 00/11] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization

Hi Gustavo, I am currently referring to your implementation for explicit synchronisation. For the same I needed your testapp, but I am unable to download the same at the link provided “https://gitlab.collabora.com/padovan/v4l2-fences-test” Could you please help me out with the same. Regards

Re: [RFC v5 00/11] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization

Hi Gustavo, I am currently referring to your implementation for explicit synchronisation. For the same I needed your testapp, but I am unable to download the same at the link provided “https://gitlab.collabora.com/padovan/v4l2-fences-test” Could you please help me out with the same. Regards

[RFC v5 00/11] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization

From: Gustavo Padovan Hi, After the comments received in the last patchset[1] and during the media summit [2] here is the new and improved version of the patchset. The implementation is simpler, smaller and cover a lot more cases. If you look to the last

[RFC v5 00/11] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization

From: Gustavo Padovan Hi, After the comments received in the last patchset[1] and during the media summit [2] here is the new and improved version of the patchset. The implementation is simpler, smaller and cover a lot more cases. If you look to the last patchset I got rid of a few things,