Nicolai Stange writes:
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>>>
>>> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> >> Thomas Gleixner writes:
Nicolai Stange writes:
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>>>
>>> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> >> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>>> >> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be
>>>
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> >> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>> >> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> >> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>> >> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be
>> >> > done
>> >> > in
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> >> Thomas Gleixner writes:
> >> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be
> >> > done
> >> > in
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> >> Thomas Gleixner writes:
> >> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be
> >> > done
> >> > in clockevents_adjust_all_freqs() ?
> >>
> >> Not
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be done
>> > in clockevents_adjust_all_freqs() ?
>>
>> Not exactly, I had a look at
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be done
>> > in clockevents_adjust_all_freqs() ?
>>
>> Not exactly, I had a look at its invocation frequency which seems to
>>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be done
> > in clockevents_adjust_all_freqs() ?
>
> Not exactly, I had a look at its invocation frequency which seems to
> decay
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
> > Have you ever measured the overhead of the extra work which has to be done
> > in clockevents_adjust_all_freqs() ?
>
> Not exactly, I had a look at its invocation frequency which seems to
> decay exponentially with uptime,
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
>> Goal: avoid programming ced devices too early for large deltas, for
>> details, c.f. the description of [21/23].
>>
>> [21-23/23] Actually do the frequency adjustments.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
>> Goal: avoid programming ced devices too early for large deltas, for
>> details, c.f. the description of [21/23].
>>
>> [21-23/23] Actually do the frequency adjustments.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64 and next-20160916.
>
>
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Goal: avoid programming ced devices too early for large deltas, for
> details, c.f. the description of [21/23].
>
> [21-23/23] Actually do the frequency adjustments.
>
> Tested on x86_64 and next-20160916.
Have you ever measured the overhead
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Goal: avoid programming ced devices too early for large deltas, for
> details, c.f. the description of [21/23].
>
> [21-23/23] Actually do the frequency adjustments.
>
> Tested on x86_64 and next-20160916.
Have you ever measured the overhead
Goal: avoid programming ced devices too early for large deltas, for
details, c.f. the description of [21/23].
Previous v6 can be found here:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160909200033.32103-1-nicsta...@gmail.com
Your objections [0] to v6 have both been towards
[1/23] ("clocksource: sh_cmt:
Goal: avoid programming ced devices too early for large deltas, for
details, c.f. the description of [21/23].
Previous v6 can be found here:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160909200033.32103-1-nicsta...@gmail.com
Your objections [0] to v6 have both been towards
[1/23] ("clocksource: sh_cmt:
16 matches
Mail list logo