From: Mark Fortescue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:55:20 +0100 (BST)
> I have formulated a patch that prevents the update_mmu_cache from doing
> enything if there is no context available. This apears to have no
> immediate, undesirable side effects.
>
> This worked better than
Hi David,
I have formulated a patch that prevents the update_mmu_cache from doing
enything if there is no context available. This apears to have no
immediate, undesirable side effects.
This worked better than the alternative of setting up a context to work with.
Can you for see any issues
From: Mark Fortescue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:35:29 +0100 (BST)
> The original code did a job lot of pte stuf in install_arg_page. The
> new code seems to replace this using get_user_pages but I have not
> worked out how get_user_pages gets to the point at which it
>
From: Mark Fortescue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:35:29 +0100 (BST)
The original code did a job lot of pte stuf in install_arg_page. The
new code seems to replace this using get_user_pages but I have not
worked out how get_user_pages gets to the point at which it
allocated
Hi David,
I have formulated a patch that prevents the update_mmu_cache from doing
enything if there is no context available. This apears to have no
immediate, undesirable side effects.
This worked better than the alternative of setting up a context to work with.
Can you for see any issues
From: Mark Fortescue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:55:20 +0100 (BST)
I have formulated a patch that prevents the update_mmu_cache from doing
enything if there is no context available. This apears to have no
immediate, undesirable side effects.
This worked better than the
Hi David,
One possible issue is sequencing, perhaps the stack argument copy
is occuring before the new context is setup properly on sun4c.
I think it is somthing related to this but too much has changed for me to
work out what is going on. At present, I don't have a good enough
On 7/29/07, Mark Fortescue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Unfortunatly Sparc32 sun4c low level memory management apears to be
> incompatible with commit b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
> mm: variable length argument support.
I feel like I ought to help out with this since it's
Hi David,
Thanks for the comments.
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, David Miller wrote:
From: Mark Fortescue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:18:42 +0100 (BST)
Unfortunatly Sparc32 sun4c low level memory management apears to be
incompatible with commit
Hi David,
Thanks for the comments.
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, David Miller wrote:
From: Mark Fortescue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:18:42 +0100 (BST)
Unfortunatly Sparc32 sun4c low level memory management apears to be
incompatible with commit
On 7/29/07, Mark Fortescue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Unfortunatly Sparc32 sun4c low level memory management apears to be
incompatible with commit b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
mm: variable length argument support.
I feel like I ought to help out with this since it's my
Hi David,
One possible issue is sequencing, perhaps the stack argument copy
is occuring before the new context is setup properly on sun4c.
I think it is somthing related to this but too much has changed for me to
work out what is going on. At present, I don't have a good enough
From: Mark Fortescue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:18:42 +0100 (BST)
> Unfortunatly Sparc32 sun4c low level memory management apears to be
> incompatible with commit b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
> mm: variable length argument support.
>
> For some reason, this commit
Hi All,
Unfortunatly Sparc32 sun4c low level memory management apears to be
incompatible with commit b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
mm: variable length argument support.
For some reason, this commit corrupts the memory used by the low level
context/pte handling ring buffers in
Hi All,
Unfortunatly Sparc32 sun4c low level memory management apears to be
incompatible with commit b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
mm: variable length argument support.
For some reason, this commit corrupts the memory used by the low level
context/pte handling ring buffers in
From: Mark Fortescue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:18:42 +0100 (BST)
Unfortunatly Sparc32 sun4c low level memory management apears to be
incompatible with commit b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
mm: variable length argument support.
For some reason, this commit
16 matches
Mail list logo
