Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Lee Jones
> With these series as they are, we need 'clk_ignore_unused' on > sthi407-b2120.dts and stih418-b2199.dts. > > We have to modificate stih407-clock.dtsi and stih418-clock.dtsi in same way. Just to clarify this point for all interested parties; this patch-set is not the completed article. It's

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: > Hi Peter, Lee, > > With these series as they are, we need 'clk_ignore_unused' on > sthi407-b2120.dts and stih418-b2199.dts. > > We have to modificate stih407-clock.dtsi and stih418-clock.dtsi in same way. Absolutely. It's on my backlog. > On

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015, Peter Griffin wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Some hardware contains bunches of clocks which must never be > > turned off. If drivers a) fail to obtain a reference to any > > of these or b) give up a previously obtained reference > > during

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Gabriel Fernandez
Hi Peter, Lee, With these series as they are, we need 'clk_ignore_unused' on sthi407-b2120.dts and stih418-b2199.dts. We have to modificate stih407-clock.dtsi and stih418-clock.dtsi in same way. BR Gabriel On 2 April 2015 at 10:12, Peter Griffin wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Lee

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Peter Griffin
Hi Lee, On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > Some hardware contains bunches of clocks which must never be > turned off. If drivers a) fail to obtain a reference to any > of these or b) give up a previously obtained reference > during suspend, the common clk framework will attempt to >

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Peter Griffin
Hi Lee, On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote: Some hardware contains bunches of clocks which must never be turned off. If drivers a) fail to obtain a reference to any of these or b) give up a previously obtained reference during suspend, the common clk framework will attempt to disable

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Gabriel Fernandez
Hi Peter, Lee, With these series as they are, we need 'clk_ignore_unused' on sthi407-b2120.dts and stih418-b2199.dts. We have to modificate stih407-clock.dtsi and stih418-clock.dtsi in same way. BR Gabriel On 2 April 2015 at 10:12, Peter Griffin peter.grif...@linaro.org wrote: Hi Lee, On

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015, Peter Griffin wrote: Hi Lee, On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote: Some hardware contains bunches of clocks which must never be turned off. If drivers a) fail to obtain a reference to any of these or b) give up a previously obtained reference during suspend,

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: Hi Peter, Lee, With these series as they are, we need 'clk_ignore_unused' on sthi407-b2120.dts and stih418-b2199.dts. We have to modificate stih407-clock.dtsi and stih418-clock.dtsi in same way. Absolutely. It's on my backlog. On 2 April

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks

2015-04-02 Thread Lee Jones
With these series as they are, we need 'clk_ignore_unused' on sthi407-b2120.dts and stih418-b2199.dts. We have to modificate stih407-clock.dtsi and stih418-clock.dtsi in same way. Just to clarify this point for all interested parties; this patch-set is not the completed article. It's