Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-03-31 Thread Michael Turquette
Quoting Lee Jones (2015-03-02 00:16:06) > On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > > Hi Lee, > > > > On 02/27/2015 10:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > >Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal. > > >The only way to recover from these catastrophic failures is to

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-03-31 Thread Michael Turquette
Quoting Lee Jones (2015-03-02 00:16:06) On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote: Hi Lee, On 02/27/2015 10:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal. The only way to recover from these catastrophic failures is to restart the

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-03-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > On 03/02/2015 11:18 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >On Mon, 02 Mar 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: > > > >>On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >>>On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: > >>> > On 28 February 2015 at 02:44, Lee Jones wrote: >

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-03-02 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 03/02/2015 11:18 AM, Lee Jones wrote: On Mon, 02 Mar 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Lee Jones wrote: On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: On 28 February 2015 at 02:44, Lee Jones wrote: Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal.

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-03-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On 02/27/2015 10:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal. > >The only way to recover from these catastrophic failures is to restart > >the board(s). Now, when a clock is

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-03-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote: Hi Lee, On 02/27/2015 10:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal. The only way to recover from these catastrophic failures is to restart the board(s). Now, when a clock is registered with

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-03-02 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 03/02/2015 11:18 AM, Lee Jones wrote: On Mon, 02 Mar 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: On 28 February 2015 at 02:44, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: Lots of platforms contain clocks

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-03-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote: On 03/02/2015 11:18 AM, Lee Jones wrote: On Mon, 02 Mar 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Jassi Brar wrote: On 28 February 2015 at 02:44, Lee Jones

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-02-27 Thread Maxime Coquelin
Hi Lee, On 02/27/2015 10:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal. The only way to recover from these catastrophic failures is to restart the board(s). Now, when a clock is registered with the framework it is compared against a list of

Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support

2015-02-27 Thread Maxime Coquelin
Hi Lee, On 02/27/2015 10:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal. The only way to recover from these catastrophic failures is to restart the board(s). Now, when a clock is registered with the framework it is compared against a list of