On 03/16/2014 05:36 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/15/2014 02:30 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 03/11/2014 09:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 03/10/2014 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> [...]
> Else ('depends on' priority is higher than 'select')
>
On 03/15/2014 02:30 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 03/11/2014 09:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 03/10/2014 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> [...]
Else ('depends on' priority is higher than 'select')
- some architectures can choose whether
On 03/11/2014 09:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
>>> Else ('depends on' priority is higher than 'select')
>>>
>>> - some architectures can choose whether support IRQ_DOMAIN.
>>>
>>> - if IRQ_DOMAIN enabled,
On 03/11/2014 09:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/10/2014 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
Else ('depends on' priority is higher than 'select')
- some architectures can choose whether support IRQ_DOMAIN.
- if IRQ_DOMAIN enabled, our gpio driver can
On 03/15/2014 02:30 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/11/2014 09:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/10/2014 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
Else ('depends on' priority is higher than 'select')
- some architectures can choose whether support IRQ_DOMAIN.
-
On 03/16/2014 05:36 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/15/2014 02:30 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/11/2014 09:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/10/2014 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
Else ('depends on' priority is higher than 'select')
- some
On 03/10/2014 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 03/09/2014 05:58 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 03/08/2014 01:44 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Can we say that the 'select' priority is higher or equal than 'depends
>> on'? If we really can say so, we
On 03/10/2014 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/09/2014 05:58 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/08/2014 01:44 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
Can we say that the 'select' priority is higher or equal than 'depends
on'? If we really can say so, we need change
On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 03/09/2014 05:58 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 03/08/2014 01:44 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 03/08/2014 11:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> [...]
> Welcome any suggestions, discussions and completions.
On 03/09/2014 05:58 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/08/2014 01:44 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 03/08/2014 11:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> [...]
Welcome any suggestions, discussions and completions.
Thanks.
>>>
>>> A patch has already
On 03/09/2014 05:58 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/08/2014 01:44 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/08/2014 11:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
Welcome any suggestions, discussions and completions.
Thanks.
A patch has already been submitted and applied by
On 03/09/2014 08:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/09/2014 05:58 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/08/2014 01:44 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/08/2014 11:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
Welcome any suggestions, discussions and completions.
Thanks.
A patch
On 03/08/2014 01:44 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 03/08/2014 11:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> [...]
>>> Welcome any suggestions, discussions and completions.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> A patch has already been submitted and applied by the subsystem maintainer.
On 03/08/2014 11:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
>> Welcome any suggestions, discussions and completions.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> A patch has already been submitted and applied by the subsystem maintainer.
>
>
On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> "A module selects GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP and depend on IRQ_DOMAIN". For me,
> it is a reasonable selection and dependency, but "make allmodconfig"
> will report error. I guess it is the "Makefile allmodconfig" issue.
>
> The related error
Hello All:
"A module selects GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP and depend on IRQ_DOMAIN". For me,
it is a reasonable selection and dependency, but "make allmodconfig"
will report error. I guess it is the "Makefile allmodconfig" issue.
The related error report:
[root@gchen linux-next]# make ARCH=avr32
Hello All:
A module selects GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP and depend on IRQ_DOMAIN. For me,
it is a reasonable selection and dependency, but make allmodconfig
will report error. I guess it is the Makefile allmodconfig issue.
The related error report:
[root@gchen linux-next]# make ARCH=avr32
On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
Hello All:
A module selects GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP and depend on IRQ_DOMAIN. For me,
it is a reasonable selection and dependency, but make allmodconfig
will report error. I guess it is the Makefile allmodconfig issue.
The related error report:
On 03/08/2014 11:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
Welcome any suggestions, discussions and completions.
Thanks.
A patch has already been submitted and applied by the subsystem maintainer.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpiom=139413626320431w=2
OK,
On 03/08/2014 01:44 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 03/08/2014 11:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 03/08/2014 05:07 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
Welcome any suggestions, discussions and completions.
Thanks.
A patch has already been submitted and applied by the subsystem maintainer.
20 matches
Mail list logo
