For what it's worth, the new branch-management code also needs realloc():
right now I do a kfree/kalloc instead. So I'm all for having a true
krealloc function.
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
For what it's worth, the new branch-management code also needs realloc():
right now I do a kfree/kalloc instead. So I'm all for having a true
krealloc function.
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Josef Sipek:
> That's the only user of malloc_sizes. It is supposed to be an optimization -
> we get the smallest sized piece of memory even if we don't need all of it.
> This way we don't reallocate & memcpy needlessly.
How about exporting ksize to modules, and introduce a new function such
Josef Sipek:
That's the only user of malloc_sizes. It is supposed to be an optimization -
we get the smallest sized piece of memory even if we don't need all of it.
This way we don't reallocate memcpy needlessly.
How about exporting ksize to modules, and introduce a new function such
like
4 matches
Mail list logo
