Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] 9p: trans_fd, initialize recv fcall properly if not set

I thought the nature of trans_fd would have prevented any sort of true zero copy, but I suppose one less is always welcome :) -eric On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2015: >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Dominique

Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] 9p: trans_fd, initialize recv fcall properly if not set

I thought the nature of trans_fd would have prevented any sort of true zero copy, but I suppose one less is always welcome :) -eric On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2015: >> On Thu, Sep 3,

Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] 9p: trans_fd, initialize recv fcall properly if not set

Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2015: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Dominique Martinet > wrote: > > To be honest, I think it might be better to just bail out if we get in > > this switch (m->req->rc == NULL after p9_tag_lookup) and not try to > > allocate more, because if we get

Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] 9p: trans_fd, initialize recv fcall properly if not set

Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2015: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Dominique Martinet > wrote: > > To be honest, I think it might be better to just bail out if we get in > > this switch (m->req->rc == NULL after p9_tag_lookup) and not try to > > allocate