On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:01:34PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
> This seems work for me, but I've not got time to give it a more thorough
> testing.
>
> You can fold this into your series.
Thanks!
> There doesn't seem to be a way to disable QUEUE_SPINLOCKS when supported by
> the arch, is this
On 16/03/15 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> I feel that if someone were to do a Xen patch we can go ahead and merge this
> stuff (finally!).
This seems work for me, but I've not got time to give it a more thorough
testing.
You can fold this into your series.
There doesn't seem to be a way to
On 16/03/15 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I feel that if someone were to do a Xen patch we can go ahead and merge this
stuff (finally!).
This seems work for me, but I've not got time to give it a more thorough
testing.
You can fold this into your series.
There doesn't seem to be a way to
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:01:34PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
This seems work for me, but I've not got time to give it a more thorough
testing.
You can fold this into your series.
Thanks!
There doesn't seem to be a way to disable QUEUE_SPINLOCKS when supported by
the arch, is this
On 16/03/15 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi Waiman,
>
> As promised; here is the paravirt stuff I did during the trip to BOS last
> week.
>
> All the !paravirt patches are more or less the same as before (the only real
> change is the copyright lines in the first patch).
>
> The paravirt
On 16/03/15 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hi Waiman,
As promised; here is the paravirt stuff I did during the trip to BOS last
week.
All the !paravirt patches are more or less the same as before (the only real
change is the copyright lines in the first patch).
The paravirt stuff is
6 matches
Mail list logo
