On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 11:58 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 18:10 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree with your point (I thought about it myself) but the current
> > > assembly scheme for hypercalls doesn't work
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 18:10 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >
> > I agree with your point (I thought about it myself) but the current
> > assembly scheme for hypercalls doesn't work well with that. I would have
> > to introduce, and maintain going forw
On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 18:10 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> I agree with your point (I thought about it myself) but the current
> assembly scheme for hypercalls doesn't work well with that. I would have
> to introduce, and maintain going forward, two special hypercall
> implementations in ass
(CC David, Boris and Konrad)
On 13/11/15 18:10, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> On 12/11/15 17:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - rename dom0_op to platform_op
>>> -
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 12/11/15 17:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - rename dom0_op to platform_op
> > ---
> > arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h |2 ++
> > arch/arm/xen/enli
Hi Stefano,
On 12/11/15 17:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - rename dom0_op to platform_op
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h |2 ++
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c |1 +
> arch/arm/xen/hypercall.S
6 matches
Mail list logo
