Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag

On 13/06/14 18:00, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag. EFI_PARAVIRT would be a clearer name I think. > +#define EFI_NO_DIRECT6 /* Can we access EFI directly? > */ #define EFI_PARAVIRT 6 /* Access is via a paravirt interface */ David -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag

On 13/06/14 18:00, Daniel Kiper wrote: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag. EFI_PARAVIRT would be a clearer name I think. +#define EFI_NO_DIRECT6 /* Can we access EFI directly? */ #define EFI_PARAVIRT 6 /* Access is via a paravirt interface */ David -- To unsubscribe from