On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:10:08PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 11/1/17 4:08 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:49:15AM +0530, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >>>
> >>>BUT given that we have seen stuff i am inclined to add a counter, we cant
> >>>have more than 11 device
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:10:08PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 11/1/17 4:08 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:49:15AM +0530, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >>>
> >>>BUT given that we have seen stuff i am inclined to add a counter, we cant
> >>>have more than 11 device
On 11/1/17 4:08 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:49:15AM +0530, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
+ if (found == false) {
+ /* TODO: Park this device in Group 13 */
+ dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave Entry not found");
No break
On 11/1/17 4:08 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:49:15AM +0530, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
+ if (found == false) {
+ /* TODO: Park this device in Group 13 */
+ dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave Entry not found");
No break
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:49:15AM +0530, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> >
> >>>+ if (found == false) {
> >>>+ /* TODO: Park this device in Group 13 */
> >>>+ dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave Entry not found");
> >>
> >>No break here? Otherwise...
> >
> >Thats
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:49:15AM +0530, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> >
> >>>+ if (found == false) {
> >>>+ /* TODO: Park this device in Group 13 */
> >>>+ dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave Entry not found");
> >>
> >>No break here? Otherwise...
> >
> >Thats
+ if (found == false) {
+ /* TODO: Park this device in Group 13 */
+ dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave Entry not found");
No break here? Otherwise...
Thats intentional. We want to still read next device that show up
+ }
+
+ if (found == false) {
+ /* TODO: Park this device in Group 13 */
+ dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave Entry not found");
No break here? Otherwise...
Thats intentional. We want to still read next device that show up
+ }
+
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 05:03:24 +0200,
> Vinod Koul wrote:
Sorry looks like I missed replying on this one, my apologies
> > +static struct sdw_slave *sdw_get_slave(struct sdw_bus *bus, int i)
> > +{
> > + struct sdw_slave *slave;
> >
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 05:03:24 +0200,
> Vinod Koul wrote:
Sorry looks like I missed replying on this one, my apologies
> > +static struct sdw_slave *sdw_get_slave(struct sdw_bus *bus, int i)
> > +{
> > + struct sdw_slave *slave;
> >
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 05:03:24 +0200,
Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> +static struct sdw_slave *sdw_get_slave(struct sdw_bus *bus, int i)
> +{
> + struct sdw_slave *slave;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(slave, >slaves, node) {
> + if (slave->dev_num == i)
> + return
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 05:03:24 +0200,
Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> +static struct sdw_slave *sdw_get_slave(struct sdw_bus *bus, int i)
> +{
> + struct sdw_slave *slave;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(slave, >slaves, node) {
> + if (slave->dev_num == i)
> + return
12 matches
Mail list logo
