On 1/5/2018 9:13 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 1/5/18 4:06 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 1/3/2018 1:23 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 1/2/18 12:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
I wrote the code for HDaudio and I
On 1/5/2018 9:13 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 1/5/18 4:06 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 1/3/2018 1:23 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 1/2/18 12:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
I wrote the code for HDaudio and I
On 1/5/18 4:06 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 1/3/2018 1:23 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 1/2/18 12:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
I wrote the code for HDaudio and I remember wasting time trying to
figure
out the
On 1/5/18 4:06 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 1/3/2018 1:23 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 1/2/18 12:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
I wrote the code for HDaudio and I remember wasting time trying to
figure
out the
On 1/3/2018 1:23 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 1/2/18 12:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
I wrote the code for HDaudio and I remember wasting time trying to
figure
out the gory details of the cycle counter stuff when
On 1/3/2018 1:23 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 1/2/18 12:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
I wrote the code for HDaudio and I remember wasting time trying to
figure
out the gory details of the cycle counter stuff when
On 1/2/18 12:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
I wrote the code for HDaudio and I remember wasting time trying to figure
out the gory details of the cycle counter stuff when all I wanted was a
conversion from a 24MHz counter to
On 1/2/18 12:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
I wrote the code for HDaudio and I remember wasting time trying to figure
out the gory details of the cycle counter stuff when all I wanted was a
conversion from a 24MHz counter to
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> I wrote the code for HDaudio and I remember wasting time trying to figure
> out the gory details of the cycle counter stuff when all I wanted was a
> conversion from a 24MHz counter to ns values using a 125/3 operation in the
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:15:45AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> I wrote the code for HDaudio and I remember wasting time trying to figure
> out the gory details of the cycle counter stuff when all I wanted was a
> conversion from a 24MHz counter to ns values using a 125/3 operation in the
On 1/2/18 12:03 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 12/28/2017 10:19 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 01:07:35PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
Or can we provide simpler versions for covering some defaults? At
least reducing the number of arguments would make things easier.
On 1/2/18 12:03 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 12/28/2017 10:19 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 01:07:35PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
Or can we provide simpler versions for covering some defaults? At
least reducing the number of arguments would make things easier.
On 12/28/2017 10:19 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 01:07:35PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
Or can we provide simpler versions for covering some defaults? At
least reducing the number of arguments would make things easier.
Thought about specifying 1. cyclecounter read
On 12/28/2017 10:19 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 01:07:35PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
Or can we provide simpler versions for covering some defaults? At
least reducing the number of arguments would make things easier.
Thought about specifying 1. cyclecounter read
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 01:07:35PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> > Or can we provide simpler versions for covering some defaults? At
> > least reducing the number of arguments would make things easier.
> Thought about specifying 1. cyclecounter read func 2. frequency 3. width of
> counter as
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 01:07:35PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> > Or can we provide simpler versions for covering some defaults? At
> > least reducing the number of arguments would make things easier.
> Thought about specifying 1. cyclecounter read func 2. frequency 3. width of
> counter as
On 12/15/2017 10:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:51:25 +0100,
Richard Cochran wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
- struct cyclecounter *cc = _dev->tc.cc;
- cc->read = azx_cc_read;
- cc->mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32);
-
On 12/15/2017 10:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:51:25 +0100,
Richard Cochran wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
- struct cyclecounter *cc = _dev->tc.cc;
- cc->read = azx_cc_read;
- cc->mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32);
-
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:51:25 +0100,
Richard Cochran wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > > - struct cyclecounter *cc = _dev->tc.cc;
>
> > > - cc->read = azx_cc_read;
> > > - cc->mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32);
>
> > > - cc->mult = 125; /* saturation after
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:51:25 +0100,
Richard Cochran wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > > - struct cyclecounter *cc = _dev->tc.cc;
>
> > > - cc->read = azx_cc_read;
> > > - cc->mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32);
>
> > > - cc->mult = 125; /* saturation after
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > - struct cyclecounter *cc = _dev->tc.cc;
> > - cc->read = azx_cc_read;
> > - cc->mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32);
> > - cc->mult = 125; /* saturation after 195 years */
> > - cc->shift = 0;
I want to get away from this
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > - struct cyclecounter *cc = _dev->tc.cc;
> > - cc->read = azx_cc_read;
> > - cc->mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32);
> > - cc->mult = 125; /* saturation after 195 years */
> > - cc->shift = 0;
I want to get away from this
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:38:30 +0100,
Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>
> With new interface timecounter_initialize we can initialize timecounter
> fields and underlying cyclecounter together. Update azx timecounter
> init with this new function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:38:30 +0100,
Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>
> With new interface timecounter_initialize we can initialize timecounter
> fields and underlying cyclecounter together. Update azx timecounter
> init with this new function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble
> Cc: Richard
24 matches
Mail list logo
