Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH stable] block: discard bdi_unregister() in favour of bdi_destroy()

2015-05-06 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:32 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > > bdi_unregister() now contains very little functionality. > > It contains a "WARN_ON" if bdi->dev is NULL. This warning is of no > real consequence as bdi->dev isn't needed by anything else in the function, > and it triggers if >

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH stable] block: discard bdi_unregister() in favour of bdi_destroy()

2015-05-06 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:32 PM, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote: bdi_unregister() now contains very little functionality. It contains a WARN_ON if bdi-dev is NULL. This warning is of no real consequence as bdi-dev isn't needed by anything else in the function, and it triggers if