On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Previously, it was open coding __bio_clone(), that's what the setting
> bi_idx to 0 was from. With the change to bio_clone_bioset() that's no
> longer necessary (and dangerous, since bi_idx needs to be consistent
> with
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Previously, it was open coding __bio_clone(), that's what the setting
bi_idx to 0 was from. With the change to bio_clone_bioset() that's no
longer necessary (and dangerous, since bi_idx needs to be consistent
with
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:50:59PM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Previously, there was bio_clone() but it only allocated from the fs bio
> > set; as a result various users were open coding it and using
> > __bio_clone().
>
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:50:59PM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Previously, there was bio_clone() but it only allocated from the fs bio
set; as a result various users were open coding it and using
__bio_clone().
Explain
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Previously, there was bio_clone() but it only allocated from the fs bio
> set; as a result various users were open coding it and using
> __bio_clone().
Explain in the header the reasoning behind the change to dm-crypt so that
it
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Previously, there was bio_clone() but it only allocated from the fs bio
set; as a result various users were open coding it and using
__bio_clone().
Explain in the header the reasoning behind the change to dm-crypt so that
it no
6 matches
Mail list logo