> -Original Message-
> From: Jin Xu [mailto:linuxclim...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 7:49 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: ???; linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 谭姝
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-de
Did this patch pass the basic build? There seems have a typo
regarding MAX_BIO_BLOCK.
--
Jin
On 13/09/2013 18:07, Chao Yu wrote:
> This patch add macro MAX_BIO_BLOCKS to limit value of npages in
> f2fs_bio_alloc,
> it can avoid to return NULL in bio_alloc caused by npages is larger than
>
This patch add macro MAX_BIO_BLOCKS to limit value of npages in
f2fs_bio_alloc,
it can avoid to return NULL in bio_alloc caused by npages is larger than
UIO_MAXIOV.
Signed-off-by: Yu Chao
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c |4 +++-
fs/f2fs/segment.h |3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1
This patch add macro MAX_BIO_BLOCKS to limit value of npages in
f2fs_bio_alloc,
it can avoid to return NULL in bio_alloc caused by npages is larger than
UIO_MAXIOV.
Signed-off-by: Yu Chao chao2...@samsung.com
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c |4 +++-
fs/f2fs/segment.h |3 +++
2 files changed, 6
Did this patch pass the basic build? There seems have a typo
regarding MAX_BIO_BLOCK.
--
Jin
On 13/09/2013 18:07, Chao Yu wrote:
This patch add macro MAX_BIO_BLOCKS to limit value of npages in
f2fs_bio_alloc,
it can avoid to return NULL in bio_alloc caused by npages is larger than
-Original Message-
From: Jin Xu [mailto:linuxclim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 7:49 PM
To: Chao Yu
Cc: ???; linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 谭姝
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev][PATCH] f2fs: limit nr_iovecs
6 matches
Mail list logo
