On 2017/10/30 15:19, Fan Li wrote:
> Make three modification for __update_nat_bits:
> 1. Take the codes of dealing the nat with nid 0 out of the loop
> Such nat only needs to be dealt with once at beginning.
> 2. Use " nat_index == 0" instead of " start_nid == 0" to decide if it's the
> first
On 2017/10/30 15:19, Fan Li wrote:
> Make three modification for __update_nat_bits:
> 1. Take the codes of dealing the nat with nid 0 out of the loop
> Such nat only needs to be dealt with once at beginning.
> 2. Use " nat_index == 0" instead of " start_nid == 0" to decide if it's the
> first
Make three modification for __update_nat_bits:
1. Take the codes of dealing the nat with nid 0 out of the loop
Such nat only needs to be dealt with once at beginning.
2. Use " nat_index == 0" instead of " start_nid == 0" to decide if it's the
first nat block
It's better that we don't
Make three modification for __update_nat_bits:
1. Take the codes of dealing the nat with nid 0 out of the loop
Such nat only needs to be dealt with once at beginning.
2. Use " nat_index == 0" instead of " start_nid == 0" to decide if it's the
first nat block
It's better that we don't
4 matches
Mail list logo
