Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-21 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:49:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Can you narrow down the -gitX release further? i.e. does 2.6.20-git13 > perform at full speed? -git13 includes several libata changes, but does > not include the ACPI additions. > > Since this is an ACPI execution error in the

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-21 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:49:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Can you narrow down the -gitX release further? i.e. does 2.6.20-git13 > perform at full speed? -git13 includes several libata changes, but does > not include the ACPI additions. > > Since this is an ACPI execution error in the

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-21 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:49:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Can you narrow down the -gitX release further? i.e. does 2.6.20-git13 perform at full speed? -git13 includes several libata changes, but does not include the ACPI additions. Since this is an ACPI execution error in the bug,

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-21 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:49:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Can you narrow down the -gitX release further? i.e. does 2.6.20-git13 perform at full speed? -git13 includes several libata changes, but does not include the ACPI additions. Since this is an ACPI execution error in the bug,

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Alan
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:47:17 +0100 Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug > report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error > messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:21PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:21PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug > >report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error > >messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but > >the

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:56PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug > >report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error > >messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but > >the

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: Hello, introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but the performance is still slightly degraded (about

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: Hello, introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but the performance is still slightly degraded (about

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
Hello, introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but the performance is still slightly degraded (about 10%). -- Lukáš

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
Hello, introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but the performance is still slightly degraded (about 10%). -- Lukáš

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: Hello, introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but the performance is still slightly degraded (about

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: Hello, introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but the performance is still slightly degraded (about

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:56PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but the performance

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:21PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but the performance

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Alan
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:47:17 +0100 Lukas Hejtmanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works

Re: [git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:21PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok

[git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
This has been living in libata-dev#ALL (and thus -mm) for quite a while now. For both PATA and SATA, this helps at suspend/resume time. For SATA, ACPI support mostly consists of taskfiles (ATA commands) that the BIOS wants us to send to the system drive. Most notably, if you have set a hard

[git patches] libata ACPI support

2007-02-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
This has been living in libata-dev#ALL (and thus -mm) for quite a while now. For both PATA and SATA, this helps at suspend/resume time. For SATA, ACPI support mostly consists of taskfiles (ATA commands) that the BIOS wants us to send to the system drive. Most notably, if you have set a hard