On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:33:27PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 20 October 2015 at 07:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:19:08PM -0400, da...@codemonkey.org.uk wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>
> >> > > The warning on boot
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:33:27PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 20 October 2015 at 07:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:19:08PM -0400, da...@codemonkey.org.uk wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>
> >> > >
On 20 October 2015 at 07:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:19:08PM -0400, da...@codemonkey.org.uk wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> > > The warning on boot seems to be gone as of rc3, but I can now trigger
>> this pretty easily..
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:19:08PM -0400, da...@codemonkey.org.uk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > > The warning on boot seems to be gone as of rc3, but I can now trigger
> this pretty easily..
> >
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60618/
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > The warning on boot seems to be gone as of rc3, but I can now trigger this
> > pretty easily..
>
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60618/
Back from several weeks of travel.. I tried again with rc6, and
I'm still
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > The warning on boot seems to be gone as of rc3, but I can now trigger this
> > pretty easily..
>
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60618/
Back from several weeks of travel.. I tried again with rc6, and
I'm still
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:19:08PM -0400, da...@codemonkey.org.uk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > > The warning on boot seems to be gone as of rc3, but I can now trigger
> this pretty easily..
> >
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60618/
On 20 October 2015 at 07:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:19:08PM -0400, da...@codemonkey.org.uk wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> > > The warning on boot seems to be gone as of rc3, but I can now trigger
>> this
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 09:07:22PM -0400, da...@codemonkey.org.uk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:26:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "da...@codemonkey.org.uk"
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> > > > Hey,
> > > >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 09:07:22PM -0400, da...@codemonkey.org.uk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:26:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "da...@codemonkey.org.uk"
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:26:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "da...@codemonkey.org.uk"
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
> > > > On Tue,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:26:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "da...@codemonkey.org.uk"
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "da...@codemonkey.org.uk" wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "da...@codemonkey.org.uk" wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22,
Hey,
Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm
Hey,
Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
> > > their recent patches.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
> > their recent patches.
Sounds like this showed up before my recent work, but I think I might
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
> their recent patches.
Adding Jairo to track this regression.
-Daniel
>
> Jesse
>
> On 09/21/2015 11:48 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at
Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
their recent patches.
Jesse
On 09/21/2015 11:48 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:45:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:40:53PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Linus,
>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
> > their recent patches.
Sounds like this showed up before my recent work, but I think I might
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
> > > their recent patches.
Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
their recent patches.
Jesse
On 09/21/2015 11:48 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:45:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:40:53PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Linus,
>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
> their recent patches.
Adding Jairo to track this regression.
-Daniel
>
> Jesse
>
> On 09/21/2015 11:48 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:45:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:40:53PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably
> the biggest
> > amount of changes in here, since it missed
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:45:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:40:53PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably
> the biggest
> > amount of changes in here, since it missed
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> i.e. 59 commits in a 5000 commit tree is likely not that bad, 59
> commits in a 20 commit tree would be bad.
I think it's about size of the commits. If it's 59 clean oneliner
fixes, I don't think it's a big deal. If it's 59 patches that add
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> i.e. 59 commits in a 5000 commit tree is likely not that bad, 59
> commits in a 20 commit tree would be bad.
I think it's about size of the commits. If it's 59 clean oneliner
fixes, I don't think it's a big deal. If it's
On 8 September 2015 at 14:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:01:21 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> Is this to be a regular thing? because I know I'd prefer to merge
>> fixes than wait for -rc1 to be an accurate copy of linux-next.
>
> It happens when I can (almost)
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:01:21 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Is this to be a regular thing? because I know I'd prefer to merge
> fixes than wait for -rc1 to be an accurate copy of linux-next.
It happens when I can (almost) keep up with Linus' merge rate (often I
can't). It is not an issue
On 8 September 2015 at 12:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 23:40:53 +0100 (IST) Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably the
>> biggest
>> amount of changes in here, since it missed 4.2. Highlights below, along
Hi Linus,
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 23:40:53 +0100 (IST) Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably the
> biggest
> amount of changes in here, since it missed 4.2. Highlights below, along with
> the usual
> bunch of fixes. There are a few minor
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:40:53PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably the
> biggest
> amount of changes in here, since it missed 4.2. Highlights below, along with
> the usual
> bunch of fixes. There are a
On 8 September 2015 at 14:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:01:21 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> Is this to be a regular thing? because I know I'd prefer to merge
>> fixes than wait for -rc1 to be an accurate copy of
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:01:21 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Is this to be a regular thing? because I know I'd prefer to merge
> fixes than wait for -rc1 to be an accurate copy of linux-next.
It happens when I can (almost) keep up with Linus' merge rate (often I
can't).
Hi Linus,
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 23:40:53 +0100 (IST) Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably the
> biggest
> amount of changes in here, since it missed 4.2. Highlights below, along with
> the usual
> bunch of fixes. There are
On 8 September 2015 at 12:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 23:40:53 +0100 (IST) Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably the
>> biggest
>> amount of changes in here,
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:40:53PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably the
> biggest
> amount of changes in here, since it missed 4.2. Highlights below, along with
> the usual
> bunch of fixes. There are a
40 matches
Mail list logo