[git pull] vfs, pile 3
Christoph's proc_create_... cleanups series. The following changes since commit 67b8d5c7081221efa252e111cd52532ec6d4266f: Linux 4.17-rc5 (2018-05-13 16:15:17 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git hch.procfs for you to fetch changes up to 5ef03dbd91855544cd4c7c1910c3ef5226ee87e8: xfs, proc: hide unused xfs procfs helpers (2018-05-25 20:43:08 -0400) Arnd Bergmann (1): xfs, proc: hide unused xfs procfs helpers Christoph Hellwig (43): net/can: single_open_net needs to be paired with single_release_net proc: introduce a proc_pid_ns helper proc: don't detour through seq->private to get the inode proc: simplify proc_register calling conventions proc: add a proc_create_reg helper proc: introduce proc_create_seq{,_data} proc: introduce proc_create_seq_private proc: introduce proc_create_single{,_data} ipv{4,6}/udp{,lite}: simplify proc registration ipv{4,6}/tcp: simplify procfs registration ipv{4,6}/ping: simplify proc file creation ipv{4,6}/raw: simplify ѕeq_file code ipv6/flowlabel: simplify pid namespace lookup net/kcm: simplify proc registration netfilter/x_tables: simplify ѕeq_file code net: move seq_file_single_net to proc: introduce proc_create_net{,_data} proc: introduce proc_create_net_single acpi/battery: simplify procfs code sgi-gru: simplify procfs code megaraid: simplify procfs code sg: simplify procfs code afs: simplify procfs code ext4: simplify procfs code jfs: simplify procfs code staging/rtl8192u: simplify procfs code resource: switch to proc_create_seq_data drbd: switch to proc_create_single rtc/proc: switch to proc_create_single_data bonding: switch to proc_create_seq_data hostap: switch to proc_create_{seq,single}_data neigh: switch to proc_create_seq_data netfilter/xt_hashlimit: switch to proc_create_{seq,single}_data netfilter/x_tables: switch to proc_create_seq_private bluetooth: switch to proc_create_seq_data atm: simplify procfs code atm: switch to proc_create_seq_private isdn: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show ide: remove ide_driver_proc_write ide: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show tty: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show proc: update SIZEOF_PDE_INLINE_NAME for the new pde fields isdn/gigaset: add back gigaset_procinfo assignment arch/arm/kernel/dma.c | 14 +- arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 15 +- arch/arm/mach-rpc/ecard.c | 16 +- arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c| 15 +- arch/ia64/hp/sim/simserial.c | 15 +- arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c | 16 +- arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c | 16 +- arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c | 42 ++--- arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/prominfo_proc.c| 32 +--- arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn_proc_fs.c | 62 +-- arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c| 14 +- arch/mips/pci/ops-pmcmsp.c | 28 +--- arch/mips/sibyte/common/bus_watcher.c | 16 +- arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c | 17 +- arch/parisc/kernel/pdc_chassis.c | 14 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 14 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas-proc.c| 32 +--- arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 14 +- arch/s390/kernel/sysinfo.c | 28 +--- arch/sh/drivers/dma/dma-api.c | 14 +- arch/sparc/kernel/ioport.c | 19 +-- arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 16 +- arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c | 15 +- arch/xtensa/platforms/iss/console.c| 15 +- block/genhd.c | 28 +--- crypto/proc.c | 14 +- drivers/acpi/ac.c | 21 +-- drivers/acpi/battery.c | 121 +++--- drivers/acpi/button.c | 19 +-- drivers/block/DAC960.c | 49 +- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 2 +- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c | 3 +- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c | 34 +--- drivers/block/pktcdvd.c| 14 +- drivers/block/ps3vram.c| 17 +- drivers/char/apm-emulation.c | 15 +- drivers/char/ds1620.c | 14 +- drivers/char/efirtc.c | 15 +- drivers/char/misc.c
[git pull] vfs, pile 3
Christoph's proc_create_... cleanups series. The following changes since commit 67b8d5c7081221efa252e111cd52532ec6d4266f: Linux 4.17-rc5 (2018-05-13 16:15:17 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git hch.procfs for you to fetch changes up to 5ef03dbd91855544cd4c7c1910c3ef5226ee87e8: xfs, proc: hide unused xfs procfs helpers (2018-05-25 20:43:08 -0400) Arnd Bergmann (1): xfs, proc: hide unused xfs procfs helpers Christoph Hellwig (43): net/can: single_open_net needs to be paired with single_release_net proc: introduce a proc_pid_ns helper proc: don't detour through seq->private to get the inode proc: simplify proc_register calling conventions proc: add a proc_create_reg helper proc: introduce proc_create_seq{,_data} proc: introduce proc_create_seq_private proc: introduce proc_create_single{,_data} ipv{4,6}/udp{,lite}: simplify proc registration ipv{4,6}/tcp: simplify procfs registration ipv{4,6}/ping: simplify proc file creation ipv{4,6}/raw: simplify ѕeq_file code ipv6/flowlabel: simplify pid namespace lookup net/kcm: simplify proc registration netfilter/x_tables: simplify ѕeq_file code net: move seq_file_single_net to proc: introduce proc_create_net{,_data} proc: introduce proc_create_net_single acpi/battery: simplify procfs code sgi-gru: simplify procfs code megaraid: simplify procfs code sg: simplify procfs code afs: simplify procfs code ext4: simplify procfs code jfs: simplify procfs code staging/rtl8192u: simplify procfs code resource: switch to proc_create_seq_data drbd: switch to proc_create_single rtc/proc: switch to proc_create_single_data bonding: switch to proc_create_seq_data hostap: switch to proc_create_{seq,single}_data neigh: switch to proc_create_seq_data netfilter/xt_hashlimit: switch to proc_create_{seq,single}_data netfilter/x_tables: switch to proc_create_seq_private bluetooth: switch to proc_create_seq_data atm: simplify procfs code atm: switch to proc_create_seq_private isdn: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show ide: remove ide_driver_proc_write ide: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show tty: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show proc: update SIZEOF_PDE_INLINE_NAME for the new pde fields isdn/gigaset: add back gigaset_procinfo assignment arch/arm/kernel/dma.c | 14 +- arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 15 +- arch/arm/mach-rpc/ecard.c | 16 +- arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c| 15 +- arch/ia64/hp/sim/simserial.c | 15 +- arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c | 16 +- arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c | 16 +- arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c | 42 ++--- arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/prominfo_proc.c| 32 +--- arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn_proc_fs.c | 62 +-- arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c| 14 +- arch/mips/pci/ops-pmcmsp.c | 28 +--- arch/mips/sibyte/common/bus_watcher.c | 16 +- arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c | 17 +- arch/parisc/kernel/pdc_chassis.c | 14 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 14 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas-proc.c| 32 +--- arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 14 +- arch/s390/kernel/sysinfo.c | 28 +--- arch/sh/drivers/dma/dma-api.c | 14 +- arch/sparc/kernel/ioport.c | 19 +-- arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 16 +- arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c | 15 +- arch/xtensa/platforms/iss/console.c| 15 +- block/genhd.c | 28 +--- crypto/proc.c | 14 +- drivers/acpi/ac.c | 21 +-- drivers/acpi/battery.c | 121 +++--- drivers/acpi/button.c | 19 +-- drivers/block/DAC960.c | 49 +- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 2 +- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c | 3 +- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c | 34 +--- drivers/block/pktcdvd.c| 14 +- drivers/block/ps3vram.c| 17 +- drivers/char/apm-emulation.c | 15 +- drivers/char/ds1620.c | 14 +- drivers/char/efirtc.c | 15 +- drivers/char/misc.c
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:03:21AM +, Al Viro wrote: > Assorted cleanups and fixes all over the place. Fix for aio compat in !CONFIG_AIO builds folded in, commit message on seq_file patch unmangled. Other than that, identical to the previous. The following changes since commit e93b1cc8a8965da137ffea0b88e5f62fa1d2a9e6: Merge branch 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs (2016-12-19 08:23:53 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus for you to fetch changes up to faf0dcebd7b387187f29ff811d47df465ea4c9f9: Merge branch 'work.namespace' into for-linus (2016-12-22 23:04:31 -0500) Al Viro (7): remove a bogus claim about namespace_sem being held by callers of mnt_alloc_id() clone_private_mount() doesn't need to touch namespace_sem reorganize do_make_slave() move aio compat to fs/aio.c [iov_iter] fix iterate_all_kinds() on empty iterators sg_write()/bsg_write() is not fit to be called under KERNEL_DS Merge branch 'work.namespace' into for-linus Aleksa Sarai (1): fs: exec: apply CLOEXEC before changing dumpable task flags Darrick J. Wong (1): vfs: fix isize/pos/len checks for reflink & dedupe Jeff Layton (1): ufs: fix function declaration for ufs_truncate_blocks Tomasz Majchrzak (1): seq_file: reset iterator to first record for zero offset block/bsg.c | 3 ++ drivers/scsi/sg.c | 3 ++ fs/aio.c| 97 - fs/compat.c | 75 -- fs/exec.c | 10 - fs/namespace.c | 8 +--- fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 2 +- fs/pnode.c | 74 ++--- fs/read_write.c | 18 + fs/seq_file.c | 7 fs/ufs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c| 2 +- include/linux/aio.h | 5 --- kernel/sys_ni.c | 3 ++ lib/iov_iter.c | 55 +--- 15 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:03:21AM +, Al Viro wrote: > Assorted cleanups and fixes all over the place. Fix for aio compat in !CONFIG_AIO builds folded in, commit message on seq_file patch unmangled. Other than that, identical to the previous. The following changes since commit e93b1cc8a8965da137ffea0b88e5f62fa1d2a9e6: Merge branch 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs (2016-12-19 08:23:53 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus for you to fetch changes up to faf0dcebd7b387187f29ff811d47df465ea4c9f9: Merge branch 'work.namespace' into for-linus (2016-12-22 23:04:31 -0500) Al Viro (7): remove a bogus claim about namespace_sem being held by callers of mnt_alloc_id() clone_private_mount() doesn't need to touch namespace_sem reorganize do_make_slave() move aio compat to fs/aio.c [iov_iter] fix iterate_all_kinds() on empty iterators sg_write()/bsg_write() is not fit to be called under KERNEL_DS Merge branch 'work.namespace' into for-linus Aleksa Sarai (1): fs: exec: apply CLOEXEC before changing dumpable task flags Darrick J. Wong (1): vfs: fix isize/pos/len checks for reflink & dedupe Jeff Layton (1): ufs: fix function declaration for ufs_truncate_blocks Tomasz Majchrzak (1): seq_file: reset iterator to first record for zero offset block/bsg.c | 3 ++ drivers/scsi/sg.c | 3 ++ fs/aio.c| 97 - fs/compat.c | 75 -- fs/exec.c | 10 - fs/namespace.c | 8 +--- fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 2 +- fs/pnode.c | 74 ++--- fs/read_write.c | 18 + fs/seq_file.c | 7 fs/ufs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c| 2 +- include/linux/aio.h | 5 --- kernel/sys_ni.c | 3 ++ lib/iov_iter.c | 55 +--- 15 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
[git pull] vfs pile 3
Assorted cleanups and fixes all over the place. The following changes since commit e93b1cc8a8965da137ffea0b88e5f62fa1d2a9e6: Merge branch 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs (2016-12-19 08:23:53 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus for you to fetch changes up to d0375bfcdd0de588d9f8ee7ac9d2bc93c333e4fe: Merge branch 'work.namespace' into for-linus (2016-12-22 19:00:58 -0500) Al Viro (7): remove a bogus claim about namespace_sem being held by callers of mnt_alloc_id() clone_private_mount() doesn't need to touch namespace_sem reorganize do_make_slave() move aio compat to fs/aio.c [iov_iter] fix iterate_all_kinds() on empty iterators sg_write()/bsg_write() is not fit to be called under KERNEL_DS Merge branch 'work.namespace' into for-linus Aleksa Sarai (1): fs: exec: apply CLOEXEC before changing dumpable task flags Darrick J. Wong (1): vfs: fix isize/pos/len checks for reflink & dedupe Jeff Layton (1): ufs: fix function declaration for ufs_truncate_blocks Miklos Szeredi (1): seq_file: reset iterator to first record for zero offset block/bsg.c | 3 ++ drivers/scsi/sg.c | 3 ++ fs/aio.c| 97 - fs/compat.c | 75 -- fs/exec.c | 10 - fs/namespace.c | 8 +--- fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 2 +- fs/pnode.c | 74 ++--- fs/read_write.c | 18 + fs/seq_file.c | 7 fs/ufs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c| 2 +- include/linux/aio.h | 5 --- lib/iov_iter.c | 55 +--- 14 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
[git pull] vfs pile 3
Assorted cleanups and fixes all over the place. The following changes since commit e93b1cc8a8965da137ffea0b88e5f62fa1d2a9e6: Merge branch 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs (2016-12-19 08:23:53 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus for you to fetch changes up to d0375bfcdd0de588d9f8ee7ac9d2bc93c333e4fe: Merge branch 'work.namespace' into for-linus (2016-12-22 19:00:58 -0500) Al Viro (7): remove a bogus claim about namespace_sem being held by callers of mnt_alloc_id() clone_private_mount() doesn't need to touch namespace_sem reorganize do_make_slave() move aio compat to fs/aio.c [iov_iter] fix iterate_all_kinds() on empty iterators sg_write()/bsg_write() is not fit to be called under KERNEL_DS Merge branch 'work.namespace' into for-linus Aleksa Sarai (1): fs: exec: apply CLOEXEC before changing dumpable task flags Darrick J. Wong (1): vfs: fix isize/pos/len checks for reflink & dedupe Jeff Layton (1): ufs: fix function declaration for ufs_truncate_blocks Miklos Szeredi (1): seq_file: reset iterator to first record for zero offset block/bsg.c | 3 ++ drivers/scsi/sg.c | 3 ++ fs/aio.c| 97 - fs/compat.c | 75 -- fs/exec.c | 10 - fs/namespace.c | 8 +--- fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 2 +- fs/pnode.c | 74 ++--- fs/read_write.c | 18 + fs/seq_file.c | 7 fs/ufs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c| 2 +- include/linux/aio.h | 5 --- lib/iov_iter.c | 55 +--- 14 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Al Virowrote: > > I went for the second variant (backmerge), but if you prefer the third one, > just pull #for-linus-2 and I'll send a separate pull request for the last > commit. Or just cherry-pick that last commit from #for-linus after having > pulled #for-linus-2. Please don't do back-merges to avoid conflicts. I'd *much* rather just get the conflict. Especially when it's that trivial. Linus
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > I went for the second variant (backmerge), but if you prefer the third one, > just pull #for-linus-2 and I'll send a separate pull request for the last > commit. Or just cherry-pick that last commit from #for-linus after having > pulled #for-linus-2. Please don't do back-merges to avoid conflicts. I'd *much* rather just get the conflict. Especially when it's that trivial. Linus
[git pull] vfs pile 3
Assorted cleanups and fixes; in "trivial API change" department - ->d_compare() losing 'parent' argument. I'm not sure if I'd taken the right approach with the last commit; the thing is, fs/namei.c part has a trivial conflict with the userns changes already in mainline *and* the posted patch had been against the mainline. Sure, I could apply it to this branch, resolve that conflict and let you resolve the one that would induce on merge. Or I could backmerge from the point where userns changes went into mainline and apply as-is, with no conflicts for anyone. Or put it into a separate pull request after this pile gets merged. I went for the second variant (backmerge), but if you prefer the third one, just pull #for-linus-2 and I'll send a separate pull request for the last commit. Or just cherry-pick that last commit from #for-linus after having pulled #for-linus-2. The following changes since commit a867d7349e94b6409b08629886a819f802377e91: Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace (2016-07-29 15:54:19 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus for you to fetch changes up to 6141b4d64295ec08a1b48c7fcac8a566658cd64f: fs: return EPERM on immutable inode (2016-08-03 13:38:11 -0400) Al Viro (9): fold dentry_rcuwalk_invalidate() into its only remaining caller fold _d_rehash() and __d_rehash() together affs ->d_compare(): don't bother with ->d_inode cifs, msdos, vfat, hfs+: don't bother with parent in ->d_compare() get rid of 'parent' argument of ->d_compare() 9p: fix braino introduced in "9p: new helper - v9fs_parent_fid()" 9p: use clone_fid() Merge branch 'for-viro' of git://git.kernel.org/.../mszeredi/vfs into for-linus backmerge from mainline to avoid conflict in "fs: return EPERM on immutable inode" David Howells (1): cachefiles: Fix race between inactivating and culling a cache object Eryu Guan (1): fs: return EPERM on immutable inode Miklos Szeredi (3): vfs: fix deadlock in file_remove_privs() on overlayfs vfs: remove file_needs_remove_privs() vfs: make dentry_needs_remove_privs() internal Documentation/filesystems/Locking| 2 +- Documentation/filesystems/porting| 7 Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt| 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dcache.c | 2 +- fs/9p/fid.c | 26 + fs/9p/fid.h | 9 - fs/9p/vfs_inode.c| 6 +-- fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 2 +- fs/9p/xattr.c| 4 +- fs/adfs/dir.c| 2 +- fs/affs/amigaffs.c | 4 +- fs/affs/namei.c | 12 +++--- fs/cachefiles/namei.c| 5 ++- fs/cifs/dir.c| 4 +- fs/dcache.c | 55 fs/efivarfs/super.c | 3 +- fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | 4 +- fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 6 +-- fs/gfs2/inode.c | 2 +- fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h | 2 +- fs/hfs/string.c | 2 +- fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h | 3 +- fs/hfsplus/unicode.c | 4 +- fs/hpfs/dentry.c | 4 +- fs/inode.c | 7 ++-- fs/internal.h| 1 + fs/isofs/inode.c | 15 +++- fs/isofs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/ncpfs/dir.c | 6 +-- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c| 2 +- fs/utimes.c | 3 +- fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 2 +- include/linux/dcache.h | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 5 --- 36 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
[git pull] vfs pile 3
Assorted cleanups and fixes; in "trivial API change" department - ->d_compare() losing 'parent' argument. I'm not sure if I'd taken the right approach with the last commit; the thing is, fs/namei.c part has a trivial conflict with the userns changes already in mainline *and* the posted patch had been against the mainline. Sure, I could apply it to this branch, resolve that conflict and let you resolve the one that would induce on merge. Or I could backmerge from the point where userns changes went into mainline and apply as-is, with no conflicts for anyone. Or put it into a separate pull request after this pile gets merged. I went for the second variant (backmerge), but if you prefer the third one, just pull #for-linus-2 and I'll send a separate pull request for the last commit. Or just cherry-pick that last commit from #for-linus after having pulled #for-linus-2. The following changes since commit a867d7349e94b6409b08629886a819f802377e91: Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace (2016-07-29 15:54:19 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus for you to fetch changes up to 6141b4d64295ec08a1b48c7fcac8a566658cd64f: fs: return EPERM on immutable inode (2016-08-03 13:38:11 -0400) Al Viro (9): fold dentry_rcuwalk_invalidate() into its only remaining caller fold _d_rehash() and __d_rehash() together affs ->d_compare(): don't bother with ->d_inode cifs, msdos, vfat, hfs+: don't bother with parent in ->d_compare() get rid of 'parent' argument of ->d_compare() 9p: fix braino introduced in "9p: new helper - v9fs_parent_fid()" 9p: use clone_fid() Merge branch 'for-viro' of git://git.kernel.org/.../mszeredi/vfs into for-linus backmerge from mainline to avoid conflict in "fs: return EPERM on immutable inode" David Howells (1): cachefiles: Fix race between inactivating and culling a cache object Eryu Guan (1): fs: return EPERM on immutable inode Miklos Szeredi (3): vfs: fix deadlock in file_remove_privs() on overlayfs vfs: remove file_needs_remove_privs() vfs: make dentry_needs_remove_privs() internal Documentation/filesystems/Locking| 2 +- Documentation/filesystems/porting| 7 Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt| 2 +- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dcache.c | 2 +- fs/9p/fid.c | 26 + fs/9p/fid.h | 9 - fs/9p/vfs_inode.c| 6 +-- fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 2 +- fs/9p/xattr.c| 4 +- fs/adfs/dir.c| 2 +- fs/affs/amigaffs.c | 4 +- fs/affs/namei.c | 12 +++--- fs/cachefiles/namei.c| 5 ++- fs/cifs/dir.c| 4 +- fs/dcache.c | 55 fs/efivarfs/super.c | 3 +- fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | 4 +- fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 6 +-- fs/gfs2/inode.c | 2 +- fs/hfs/hfs_fs.h | 2 +- fs/hfs/string.c | 2 +- fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h | 3 +- fs/hfsplus/unicode.c | 4 +- fs/hpfs/dentry.c | 4 +- fs/inode.c | 7 ++-- fs/internal.h| 1 + fs/isofs/inode.c | 15 +++- fs/isofs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/ncpfs/dir.c | 6 +-- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c| 2 +- fs/utimes.c | 3 +- fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 2 +- include/linux/dcache.h | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 5 --- 36 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
[git pull] vfs pile 3/many...
Waiman's conversion of d_path() and bits related to it, kern_path_mountpoint(), several cleanups and fixes (exportfs one is -stable fodder, IMO). There definitely will be more... ;-/ Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Shortlog: Al Viro (8): afs: get rid of redundant ->d_name.len checks exportfs: don't assume that ->iterate() won't feed us too long entries prune_super(): sb->s_op is never NULL Kill indirect include of file.h from eventfd.h, use fdget() in cgroup.c take unlazy_walk() into umount_lookup_last() rename user_path_umountat() to user_path_mountpoint_at() introduce kern_path_mountpoint() split read_seqretry_or_unlock(), convert d_walk() to resulting primitives Ian Kent (1): autofs4 - fix device ioctl mount lookup Waiman Long (1): dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking rename_lock Diffstat: fs/afs/dir.c| 24 - fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c | 23 +++--- fs/dcache.c | 220 +++ fs/exportfs/expfs.c |2 +- fs/internal.h |3 + fs/namei.c | 112 +--- fs/namespace.c |2 +- fs/super.c |2 +- include/linux/eventfd.h |3 +- include/linux/namei.h |4 +- kernel/cgroup.c | 33 11 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[git pull] vfs pile 3/many...
Waiman's conversion of d_path() and bits related to it, kern_path_mountpoint(), several cleanups and fixes (exportfs one is -stable fodder, IMO). There definitely will be more... ;-/ Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Shortlog: Al Viro (8): afs: get rid of redundant -d_name.len checks exportfs: don't assume that -iterate() won't feed us too long entries prune_super(): sb-s_op is never NULL Kill indirect include of file.h from eventfd.h, use fdget() in cgroup.c take unlazy_walk() into umount_lookup_last() rename user_path_umountat() to user_path_mountpoint_at() introduce kern_path_mountpoint() split read_seqretry_or_unlock(), convert d_walk() to resulting primitives Ian Kent (1): autofs4 - fix device ioctl mount lookup Waiman Long (1): dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking rename_lock Diffstat: fs/afs/dir.c| 24 - fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c | 23 +++--- fs/dcache.c | 220 +++ fs/exportfs/expfs.c |2 +- fs/internal.h |3 + fs/namei.c | 112 +--- fs/namespace.c |2 +- fs/super.c |2 +- include/linux/eventfd.h |3 +- include/linux/namei.h |4 +- kernel/cgroup.c | 33 11 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
Il 13/10/2012 19:07, Al Viro ha scritto: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:04:55PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: You know, I'm in the middle of dealing with one such TODO. Yours, as it were. From six years ago. kernel_thread() unexporting. TODO comments of any form are routinely shat upon and ignored, especially when shuffled away into less read parts of the tree... ;-/ I'd rather see it done fs-by-fs. Starting with something reasonably easy to test - minixfs would do nicely. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for burying ->truncate(); what I'm worried about is that we'll end up burying the warning about the reasons why vmtruncate() was a bad idea, leaving the functionality exactly as it used to be... As mentioned I agree with the concern in principle. Let's start by taking Marco's patches for filesystems that use vmtruncate but don't actually implement ->truncate. There's a few I remember offhand, e.g. procfs and ufs right now. Then we can do the actual work required ones piece by piece. Umm... That would be what, procfs? Frankly, I'm not sure that ATTR_SIZE for procfs actually should not be silently ignored. ->i_size there is completely synthetic - it's not as if truncation would actually change the contents. And ufs situation is quite different - there vmtruncate() is used only on the ->write_begin() side. ->setattr() is already vmtruncate-free. What's needed there is an analog of e.g. ext2_write_failed(). I'm open to change the series and give any help. My original idea was to do a cleanup patch and after that give to each fs maintainer the possibility to do ad-hoc fix. Each fs maintainer has got a deep knowledge of its fs so it was a safe approach from testing point of view and so on. However if you tell me that in this case another approach is better is ok for me. I'll fix the patches according to the comments of Christoph. Regards, Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
Il 13/10/2012 19:07, Al Viro ha scritto: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:04:55PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: You know, I'm in the middle of dealing with one such TODO. Yours, as it were. From six years ago. kernel_thread() unexporting. TODO comments of any form are routinely shat upon and ignored, especially when shuffled away into less read parts of the tree... ;-/ I'd rather see it done fs-by-fs. Starting with something reasonably easy to test - minixfs would do nicely. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for burying -truncate(); what I'm worried about is that we'll end up burying the warning about the reasons why vmtruncate() was a bad idea, leaving the functionality exactly as it used to be... As mentioned I agree with the concern in principle. Let's start by taking Marco's patches for filesystems that use vmtruncate but don't actually implement -truncate. There's a few I remember offhand, e.g. procfs and ufs right now. Then we can do the actual work required ones piece by piece. Umm... That would be what, procfs? Frankly, I'm not sure that ATTR_SIZE for procfs actually should not be silently ignored. -i_size there is completely synthetic - it's not as if truncation would actually change the contents. And ufs situation is quite different - there vmtruncate() is used only on the -write_begin() side. -setattr() is already vmtruncate-free. What's needed there is an analog of e.g. ext2_write_failed(). I'm open to change the series and give any help. My original idea was to do a cleanup patch and after that give to each fs maintainer the possibility to do ad-hoc fix. Each fs maintainer has got a deep knowledge of its fs so it was a safe approach from testing point of view and so on. However if you tell me that in this case another approach is better is ok for me. I'll fix the patches according to the comments of Christoph. Regards, Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:04:55PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > You know, I'm in the middle of dealing with one such TODO. Yours, as it > > were. From six years ago. kernel_thread() unexporting. TODO comments > > of any form are routinely shat upon and ignored, especially when shuffled > > away into less read parts of the tree... ;-/ > > > > I'd rather see it done fs-by-fs. Starting with something reasonably easy > > to test - minixfs would do nicely. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for > > burying ->truncate(); what I'm worried about is that we'll end up burying > > the warning about the reasons why vmtruncate() was a bad idea, leaving the > > functionality exactly as it used to be... > > As mentioned I agree with the concern in principle. Let's start by > taking Marco's patches for filesystems that use vmtruncate but don't > actually implement ->truncate. There's a few I remember offhand, e.g. > procfs and ufs right now. Then we can do the actual work required ones > piece by piece. Umm... That would be what, procfs? Frankly, I'm not sure that ATTR_SIZE for procfs actually should not be silently ignored. ->i_size there is completely synthetic - it's not as if truncation would actually change the contents. And ufs situation is quite different - there vmtruncate() is used only on the ->write_begin() side. ->setattr() is already vmtruncate-free. What's needed there is an analog of e.g. ext2_write_failed(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > You know, I'm in the middle of dealing with one such TODO. Yours, as it > were. From six years ago. kernel_thread() unexporting. TODO comments > of any form are routinely shat upon and ignored, especially when shuffled > away into less read parts of the tree... ;-/ > > I'd rather see it done fs-by-fs. Starting with something reasonably easy > to test - minixfs would do nicely. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for > burying ->truncate(); what I'm worried about is that we'll end up burying > the warning about the reasons why vmtruncate() was a bad idea, leaving the > functionality exactly as it used to be... As mentioned I agree with the concern in principle. Let's start by taking Marco's patches for filesystems that use vmtruncate but don't actually implement ->truncate. There's a few I remember offhand, e.g. procfs and ufs right now. Then we can do the actual work required ones piece by piece. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:48:10AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:51:28AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > It's somewhat pointless on its own... If you were doing something with > > the callers afterwards - sure, it would be make sense, but as it is... > > I'd really like to see ->truncate and vmtruncate done, so from that side > I'm absolutely in favour of this series. What I'm a bit concerned about > is that it just does the trivial 1:1 conversion and not actually > converts the sequence of operations to the proper form, which was one > of the two big reasons of moving away from ->truncate to start with. > > I'd love to see the full conversion, but without adequate test coverage > for all the fringe filesystems that might be a bit too much to expect > from Marco. > > I think just doing the easy conversions he did, and putting a TODO > comment explaining how it should be taken further at each of the sites > would be valueable on its own. You know, I'm in the middle of dealing with one such TODO. Yours, as it were. From six years ago. kernel_thread() unexporting. TODO comments of any form are routinely shat upon and ignored, especially when shuffled away into less read parts of the tree... ;-/ I'd rather see it done fs-by-fs. Starting with something reasonably easy to test - minixfs would do nicely. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for burying ->truncate(); what I'm worried about is that we'll end up burying the warning about the reasons why vmtruncate() was a bad idea, leaving the functionality exactly as it used to be... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:51:28AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > It's somewhat pointless on its own... If you were doing something with > the callers afterwards - sure, it would be make sense, but as it is... I'd really like to see ->truncate and vmtruncate done, so from that side I'm absolutely in favour of this series. What I'm a bit concerned about is that it just does the trivial 1:1 conversion and not actually converts the sequence of operations to the proper form, which was one of the two big reasons of moving away from ->truncate to start with. I'd love to see the full conversion, but without adequate test coverage for all the fringe filesystems that might be a bit too much to expect from Marco. I think just doing the easy conversions he did, and putting a TODO comment explaining how it should be taken further at each of the sites would be valueable on its own. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
Il 13/10/2012 09:51, Al Viro ha scritto: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:20:45AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: Il 13/10/2012 02:20, Al Viro ha scritto: Stuff from Jeff Layton, mostly. Sanitizing interplay between audit and namei, removing a lot of insanity from audit_inode() mess and getting things ready for his ESTALE patchset. Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Al, do you see any problem to apply the patch series "drop vmtruncate"? It's somewhat pointless on its own... If you were doing something with the callers afterwards - sure, it would be make sense, but as it is... The goal of the patch was to remove a deprecated function trying to improve the code, removing the inode operation and doing a general cleanup. It's pointless for me to have "dead"/"old" code, however thanks for you comment. Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:20:45AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: > Il 13/10/2012 02:20, Al Viro ha scritto: > > Stuff from Jeff Layton, mostly. Sanitizing interplay between > >audit and namei, removing a lot of insanity from audit_inode() mess > >and getting things ready for his ESTALE patchset. Please, pull from > >the usual place - > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus > > > > Al, > > do you see any problem to apply the patch series "drop vmtruncate"? It's somewhat pointless on its own... If you were doing something with the callers afterwards - sure, it would be make sense, but as it is... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
Il 13/10/2012 02:20, Al Viro ha scritto: Stuff from Jeff Layton, mostly. Sanitizing interplay between audit and namei, removing a lot of insanity from audit_inode() mess and getting things ready for his ESTALE patchset. Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Al, do you see any problem to apply the patch series "drop vmtruncate"? Do you think it's better to push it for 3.8? Thanks, Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
Il 13/10/2012 02:20, Al Viro ha scritto: Stuff from Jeff Layton, mostly. Sanitizing interplay between audit and namei, removing a lot of insanity from audit_inode() mess and getting things ready for his ESTALE patchset. Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Al, do you see any problem to apply the patch series drop vmtruncate? Do you think it's better to push it for 3.8? Thanks, Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:20:45AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: Il 13/10/2012 02:20, Al Viro ha scritto: Stuff from Jeff Layton, mostly. Sanitizing interplay between audit and namei, removing a lot of insanity from audit_inode() mess and getting things ready for his ESTALE patchset. Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Al, do you see any problem to apply the patch series drop vmtruncate? It's somewhat pointless on its own... If you were doing something with the callers afterwards - sure, it would be make sense, but as it is... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
Il 13/10/2012 09:51, Al Viro ha scritto: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:20:45AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: Il 13/10/2012 02:20, Al Viro ha scritto: Stuff from Jeff Layton, mostly. Sanitizing interplay between audit and namei, removing a lot of insanity from audit_inode() mess and getting things ready for his ESTALE patchset. Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Al, do you see any problem to apply the patch series drop vmtruncate? It's somewhat pointless on its own... If you were doing something with the callers afterwards - sure, it would be make sense, but as it is... The goal of the patch was to remove a deprecated function trying to improve the code, removing the inode operation and doing a general cleanup. It's pointless for me to have dead/old code, however thanks for you comment. Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:51:28AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: It's somewhat pointless on its own... If you were doing something with the callers afterwards - sure, it would be make sense, but as it is... I'd really like to see -truncate and vmtruncate done, so from that side I'm absolutely in favour of this series. What I'm a bit concerned about is that it just does the trivial 1:1 conversion and not actually converts the sequence of operations to the proper form, which was one of the two big reasons of moving away from -truncate to start with. I'd love to see the full conversion, but without adequate test coverage for all the fringe filesystems that might be a bit too much to expect from Marco. I think just doing the easy conversions he did, and putting a TODO comment explaining how it should be taken further at each of the sites would be valueable on its own. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:48:10AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:51:28AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: It's somewhat pointless on its own... If you were doing something with the callers afterwards - sure, it would be make sense, but as it is... I'd really like to see -truncate and vmtruncate done, so from that side I'm absolutely in favour of this series. What I'm a bit concerned about is that it just does the trivial 1:1 conversion and not actually converts the sequence of operations to the proper form, which was one of the two big reasons of moving away from -truncate to start with. I'd love to see the full conversion, but without adequate test coverage for all the fringe filesystems that might be a bit too much to expect from Marco. I think just doing the easy conversions he did, and putting a TODO comment explaining how it should be taken further at each of the sites would be valueable on its own. You know, I'm in the middle of dealing with one such TODO. Yours, as it were. From six years ago. kernel_thread() unexporting. TODO comments of any form are routinely shat upon and ignored, especially when shuffled away into less read parts of the tree... ;-/ I'd rather see it done fs-by-fs. Starting with something reasonably easy to test - minixfs would do nicely. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for burying -truncate(); what I'm worried about is that we'll end up burying the warning about the reasons why vmtruncate() was a bad idea, leaving the functionality exactly as it used to be... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: You know, I'm in the middle of dealing with one such TODO. Yours, as it were. From six years ago. kernel_thread() unexporting. TODO comments of any form are routinely shat upon and ignored, especially when shuffled away into less read parts of the tree... ;-/ I'd rather see it done fs-by-fs. Starting with something reasonably easy to test - minixfs would do nicely. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for burying -truncate(); what I'm worried about is that we'll end up burying the warning about the reasons why vmtruncate() was a bad idea, leaving the functionality exactly as it used to be... As mentioned I agree with the concern in principle. Let's start by taking Marco's patches for filesystems that use vmtruncate but don't actually implement -truncate. There's a few I remember offhand, e.g. procfs and ufs right now. Then we can do the actual work required ones piece by piece. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [git pull] vfs pile 3
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:04:55PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: You know, I'm in the middle of dealing with one such TODO. Yours, as it were. From six years ago. kernel_thread() unexporting. TODO comments of any form are routinely shat upon and ignored, especially when shuffled away into less read parts of the tree... ;-/ I'd rather see it done fs-by-fs. Starting with something reasonably easy to test - minixfs would do nicely. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for burying -truncate(); what I'm worried about is that we'll end up burying the warning about the reasons why vmtruncate() was a bad idea, leaving the functionality exactly as it used to be... As mentioned I agree with the concern in principle. Let's start by taking Marco's patches for filesystems that use vmtruncate but don't actually implement -truncate. There's a few I remember offhand, e.g. procfs and ufs right now. Then we can do the actual work required ones piece by piece. Umm... That would be what, procfs? Frankly, I'm not sure that ATTR_SIZE for procfs actually should not be silently ignored. -i_size there is completely synthetic - it's not as if truncation would actually change the contents. And ufs situation is quite different - there vmtruncate() is used only on the -write_begin() side. -setattr() is already vmtruncate-free. What's needed there is an analog of e.g. ext2_write_failed(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[git pull] vfs pile 3
Stuff from Jeff Layton, mostly. Sanitizing interplay between audit and namei, removing a lot of insanity from audit_inode() mess and getting things ready for his ESTALE patchset. Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Shortlog: Eric Paris (1): audit: make audit_compare_dname_path use parent_len helper Jeff Layton (19): audit: remove unnecessary NULL ptr checks from do_path_lookup audit: pass in dentry to audit_copy_inode wherever possible audit: no need to walk list in audit_inode if name is NULL audit: reverse arguments to audit_inode_child audit: add a new "type" field to audit_names struct audit: set the name_len in audit_inode for parent lookups audit: remove dirlen argument to audit_compare_dname_path audit: optimize audit_compare_dname_path audit: overhaul __audit_inode_child to accomodate retrying vfs: allocate page instead of names_cache buffer in mount_block_root acct: constify the name arg to acct_on vfs: unexport getname and putname symbols vfs: define struct filename and have getname() return it audit: allow audit code to satisfy getname requests from its names_list vfs: turn do_path_lookup into wrapper around struct filename variant vfs: make path_openat take a struct filename pointer audit: make audit_inode take struct filename vfs: embed struct filename inside of names_cache allocation if possible procfs: don't need a PATH_MAX allocation to hold a string representation of an int Diffstat: arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c | 16 +- arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c |4 +- arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c |6 +- arch/avr32/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/cris/arch-v10/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/h8300/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/hexagon/kernel/syscall.c |4 +- arch/ia64/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/m32r/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/microblaze/kernel/sys_microblaze.c |4 +- arch/mips/kernel/linux32.c |4 +- arch/mips/kernel/syscall.c |4 +- arch/openrisc/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/parisc/hpux/fs.c |4 +- arch/parisc/kernel/process.c|4 +- arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc32.c |4 +- arch/score/kernel/sys_score.c |4 +- arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c |4 +- arch/sh/kernel/process_64.c |4 +- arch/sparc/kernel/process_32.c |4 +- arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c |4 +- arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc32.c |4 +- arch/tile/kernel/process.c |8 +- arch/unicore32/kernel/sys.c |4 +- arch/xtensa/kernel/process.c|4 +- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c|2 +- fs/compat.c | 12 +- fs/exec.c | 14 +- fs/filesystems.c|4 +- fs/internal.h |4 +- fs/namei.c | 213 -- fs/namespace.c |4 +- fs/open.c | 29 - fs/proc/base.c |5 +- fs/quota/quota.c|4 +- fs/xattr.c |8 +- include/linux/audit.h | 69 +++--- include/linux/fs.h | 21 +++- include/linux/fsnotify.h|8 +- init/do_mounts.c|7 +- ipc/mqueue.c| 17 ++- kernel/acct.c |6 +- kernel/audit.h |7 +- kernel/audit_watch.c|3 +- kernel/auditfilter.c| 65 ++ kernel/auditsc.c| 217 +-- mm/swapfile.c | 11 +- 49 files changed, 544 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[git pull] vfs pile 3
Stuff from Jeff Layton, mostly. Sanitizing interplay between audit and namei, removing a lot of insanity from audit_inode() mess and getting things ready for his ESTALE patchset. Please, pull from the usual place - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus Shortlog: Eric Paris (1): audit: make audit_compare_dname_path use parent_len helper Jeff Layton (19): audit: remove unnecessary NULL ptr checks from do_path_lookup audit: pass in dentry to audit_copy_inode wherever possible audit: no need to walk list in audit_inode if name is NULL audit: reverse arguments to audit_inode_child audit: add a new type field to audit_names struct audit: set the name_len in audit_inode for parent lookups audit: remove dirlen argument to audit_compare_dname_path audit: optimize audit_compare_dname_path audit: overhaul __audit_inode_child to accomodate retrying vfs: allocate page instead of names_cache buffer in mount_block_root acct: constify the name arg to acct_on vfs: unexport getname and putname symbols vfs: define struct filename and have getname() return it audit: allow audit code to satisfy getname requests from its names_list vfs: turn do_path_lookup into wrapper around struct filename variant vfs: make path_openat take a struct filename pointer audit: make audit_inode take struct filename vfs: embed struct filename inside of names_cache allocation if possible procfs: don't need a PATH_MAX allocation to hold a string representation of an int Diffstat: arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c | 16 +- arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c |4 +- arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c |6 +- arch/avr32/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/cris/arch-v10/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/h8300/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/hexagon/kernel/syscall.c |4 +- arch/ia64/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/m32r/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/microblaze/kernel/sys_microblaze.c |4 +- arch/mips/kernel/linux32.c |4 +- arch/mips/kernel/syscall.c |4 +- arch/openrisc/kernel/process.c |4 +- arch/parisc/hpux/fs.c |4 +- arch/parisc/kernel/process.c|4 +- arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc32.c |4 +- arch/score/kernel/sys_score.c |4 +- arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c |4 +- arch/sh/kernel/process_64.c |4 +- arch/sparc/kernel/process_32.c |4 +- arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c |4 +- arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc32.c |4 +- arch/tile/kernel/process.c |8 +- arch/unicore32/kernel/sys.c |4 +- arch/xtensa/kernel/process.c|4 +- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c|2 +- fs/compat.c | 12 +- fs/exec.c | 14 +- fs/filesystems.c|4 +- fs/internal.h |4 +- fs/namei.c | 213 -- fs/namespace.c |4 +- fs/open.c | 29 - fs/proc/base.c |5 +- fs/quota/quota.c|4 +- fs/xattr.c |8 +- include/linux/audit.h | 69 +++--- include/linux/fs.h | 21 +++- include/linux/fsnotify.h|8 +- init/do_mounts.c|7 +- ipc/mqueue.c| 17 ++- kernel/acct.c |6 +- kernel/audit.h |7 +- kernel/audit_watch.c|3 +- kernel/auditfilter.c| 65 ++ kernel/auditsc.c| 217 +-- mm/swapfile.c | 11 +- 49 files changed, 544 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/