2016-06-21 21:32 GMT+03:00 Rik van Riel :
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski > > wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm tempted to explicitly disallow VM_NO_GUARD in the vmalloc
>> > range.
>> > It has no
2016-06-21 21:32 GMT+03:00 Rik van Riel :
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski > > wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm tempted to explicitly disallow VM_NO_GUARD in the vmalloc
>> > range.
>> > It has no in-tree users for non-fixed addresses
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:32:28 PM CEST Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski > > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm tempted to explicitly disallow VM_NO_GUARD in the vmalloc
> > > range.
> > >
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:32:28 PM CEST Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski > > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm tempted to explicitly disallow VM_NO_GUARD in the vmalloc
> > > range.
> > > It has no in-tree users
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:32:28 PM CEST Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I'm
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:32:28 PM CEST Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I'm tempted to explicitly disallow
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski > wrote:
> >
> > I'm tempted to explicitly disallow VM_NO_GUARD in the vmalloc
> > range.
> > It has no in-tree users for non-fixed addresses right now.
> What about the
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 10:13 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski > wrote:
> >
> > I'm tempted to explicitly disallow VM_NO_GUARD in the vmalloc
> > range.
> > It has no in-tree users for non-fixed addresses right now.
> What about the lack of pre-range guard
8 matches
Mail list logo