Re: [overlayfs/port] overlayfs: v13 port attempt to kernel 3.5

2012-08-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:38 PM, J. R. Okajima wrote: > > Sedat Dilek: >> The other part to run a Linux live-system is a "Union FileSystem" - >> this part is missing (speaking of upstream). >> >> Since years AUFS seems to be the choice #1 in a lot of distros to >> workaround the problem. >>

Re: [overlayfs/port] overlayfs: v13 port attempt to kernel 3.5

2012-08-20 Thread J. R. Okajima
Sedat Dilek: > The other part to run a Linux live-system is a "Union FileSystem" - > this part is missing (speaking of upstream). > > Since years AUFS seems to be the choice #1 in a lot of distros to > workaround the problem. > NOTE: AUFS was rejected from upstream (to say not accepted).

Re: [overlayfs/port] overlayfs: v13 port attempt to kernel 3.5

2012-08-20 Thread J. R. Okajima
Sedat Dilek: The other part to run a Linux live-system is a Union FileSystem - this part is missing (speaking of upstream). Since years AUFS seems to be the choice #1 in a lot of distros to workaround the problem. NOTE: AUFS was rejected from upstream (to say not accepted). Exactly. The

Re: [overlayfs/port] overlayfs: v13 port attempt to kernel 3.5

2012-08-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:38 PM, J. R. Okajima hooano...@yahoo.co.jp wrote: Sedat Dilek: The other part to run a Linux live-system is a Union FileSystem - this part is missing (speaking of upstream). Since years AUFS seems to be the choice #1 in a lot of distros to workaround the problem.

Re: [overlayfs/port] overlayfs: v13 port attempt to kernel 3.5

2012-08-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Andrew Watts wrote: >> Might be easier to collect/extract commits listed in [1]? >> >> If you are on Ubuntu: Check mainline kernels in [2] (quantal) and [3] >> (precise). >> >> - Sedat - >> > > That indeed was much easier and I have it working great on 3.5.2.

Re: [overlayfs/port] overlayfs: v13 port attempt to kernel 3.5

2012-08-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Andrew Watts akwa...@ymail.com wrote: Might be easier to collect/extract commits listed in [1]? If you are on Ubuntu: Check mainline kernels in [2] (quantal) and [3] (precise). - Sedat - That indeed was much easier and I have it working great on 3.5.2.