On Friday 23 February 2007 4:09 am, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>
> given that Greg also agreed, you have my
> Acked-By: Alessandro Zummo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks. I'll re-issue this series in a bit with those signoffs,
after after the oops fix. Then I expect it should sit in MM for
a while.
-
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:21:36 -0800
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > thanks for your work. The interface system was originally
> > in place because it seemed the right-thing-to-do. if it isn't,
> > better to remove it ;)
>
> The Right Thing may also have changed a bit over
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:21:36 -0800
David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for your work. The interface system was originally
in place because it seemed the right-thing-to-do. if it isn't,
better to remove it ;)
The Right Thing may also have changed a bit over time!
eheh
On Friday 23 February 2007 4:09 am, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
given that Greg also agreed, you have my
Acked-By: Alessandro Zummo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. I'll re-issue this series in a bit with those signoffs,
after after the oops fix. Then I expect it should sit in MM for
a while.
- Dave
On Thursday 22 February 2007 1:37 pm, Alessandro Zummo wro
> Hi David,
>
> thanks for your work. The interface system was originally
> in place because it seemed the right-thing-to-do. if it isn't,
> better to remove it ;)
The Right Thing may also have changed a bit over time!
- Dave
-
To
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:44:31 -0800
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All of these looks good to me, feel free to add an:
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > to them if you want.
>
> Thanks ...
>
>
> > thanks for doing the class_device removal work, I
On Thursday 22 February 2007 10:09 am, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:45:14PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > The main point of this series of patches is that last one, which I'll
> > circulate just a bit more widely. (Although I think the first four are
> > also nice
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:45:14PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following this message (on the RTC list) are six patches:
>
> - Remove the /sys/class/rtc-dev class_device, and a class_interface
> - Use "struct rtc_device" in the external interface, not class_device
> - Simplify the
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:45:14PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Hi,
Following this message (on the RTC list) are six patches:
- Remove the /sys/class/rtc-dev class_device, and a class_interface
- Use struct rtc_device in the external interface, not class_device
- Simplify the sysfs
On Thursday 22 February 2007 10:09 am, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:45:14PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
The main point of this series of patches is that last one, which I'll
circulate just a bit more widely. (Although I think the first four are
also nice cleanups!) It
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:44:31 -0800
David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of these looks good to me, feel free to add an:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to them if you want.
Thanks ...
thanks for doing the class_device removal work, I appreciate it.
On Thursday 22 February 2007 1:37 pm, Alessandro Zummo wro
Hi David,
thanks for your work. The interface system was originally
in place because it seemed the right-thing-to-do. if it isn't,
better to remove it ;)
The Right Thing may also have changed a bit over time!
- Dave
-
To
Hi,
Following this message (on the RTC list) are six patches:
- Remove the /sys/class/rtc-dev class_device, and a class_interface
- Use "struct rtc_device" in the external interface, not class_device
- Simplify the sysfs attribute handling, removing a class_interface
- Simplify the
Hi,
Following this message (on the RTC list) are six patches:
- Remove the /sys/class/rtc-dev class_device, and a class_interface
- Use struct rtc_device in the external interface, not class_device
- Simplify the sysfs attribute handling, removing a class_interface
- Simplify the
14 matches
Mail list logo
