Re: [patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty

2000-09-04 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:29:56PM +0200, Rasmus Andersen wrote: > > I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran > Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts a lot of places in the kernel > (trivially), noticeably the file systems. The URL below points a > big patch for all

[patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty

2000-09-04 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts a lot of places in the kernel (trivially), noticeably the file systems. The URL below points a big patch for all these changes. (I have been advised against the fine granularity of the

[patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty

2000-09-04 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts a lot of places in the kernel (trivially), noticeably the file systems. The URL below points a big patch for all these changes. (I have been advised against the fine granularity of the

Re: [patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty

2000-09-04 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:29:56PM +0200, Rasmus Andersen wrote: I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts a lot of places in the kernel (trivially), noticeably the file systems. The URL below points a big patch for all