Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-09 Thread Al Boldi
Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset. > (The main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as > high quality as technically possible.) Thanks! I like this one a lot. There is one workload that is still handled a bit strange,

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-09 Thread Al Boldi
Ingo Molnar wrote: i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The main goal of CFS is to implement desktop scheduling with as high quality as technically possible.) Thanks! I like this one a lot. There is one workload that is still handled a bit strange, though.

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-08 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 09:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > When thud starts, chew takes a size 14EEE latency hit if bits 1, 2 and 3 > are set in sysctl_sched_load_smoothing. Well shoot, I take it back. I'm seeing it with 0x1 as well. pid 6155, prio 0, out for 32 ms, ran for4 ms, load

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-08 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 18:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > - complete and finetune the 'smooth load calculation' mechanism >(Mike Galbraith) Houston, we have alien artifacts. Artifact 1: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: taskset -c 1 ./thud 5 starting 5 children running... [EMAIL PROTECTED]: taskset -c 1

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-08 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 18:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: - complete and finetune the 'smooth load calculation' mechanism (Mike Galbraith) Houston, we have alien artifacts. Artifact 1: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: taskset -c 1 ./thud 5 starting 5 children running... [EMAIL PROTECTED]: taskset -c 1

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-08 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 09:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: When thud starts, chew takes a size 14EEE latency hit if bits 1, 2 and 3 are set in sysctl_sched_load_smoothing. Well shoot, I take it back. I'm seeing it with 0x1 as well. pid 6155, prio 0, out for 32 ms, ran for4 ms, load

RE: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
> -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar > Envoyé : 7 mai 2007 12:34 > > > i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset. > (The main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" > with as high

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread Paolo Ciarrocchi
On 5/7/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as high quality as technically possible.) The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread James Cloos
> "Ingo" == Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If instead of pulling master into the cfs branch, I rather switch to >> the master branch and pull the cfs branch into that, it works. Ingo> ah! Could you please do a git-diff between the broken and the working Ingo> tree, to see what

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread James Cloos
|> git checkout -b git checkout -b cfs v2.6.21 Damn, sorry about the typo. That should of course be: #!/bin/sh git clone -l -s -n \ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git \ 2.6.21-cfs-master cd 2.6.21-cfs-master git checkout -b cfs v2.6.21 git pull

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* James Cloos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If instead of pulling master into the cfs branch, I rather switch to > the master branch and pull the cfs branch into that, it works. ah! Could you please do a git-diff between the broken and the working tree, to see what got mismerged? Ingo

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread James Cloos
I finally had time to try bisecting the problem I was having with cfs8 and master Sunday, and was able to eliminate the problem. I had first done: clone branch checkout apply commit pull If instead of pulling master into the cfs branch, I rather switch to the master branch and pull

[patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as high quality as technically possible.) The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be downloaded from the usual place:

[patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The main goal of CFS is to implement desktop scheduling with as high quality as technically possible.) The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be downloaded from the usual place:

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread James Cloos
I finally had time to try bisecting the problem I was having with cfs8 and master Sunday, and was able to eliminate the problem. I had first done: clone branch checkout apply commit pull If instead of pulling master into the cfs branch, I rather switch to the master branch and pull

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* James Cloos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If instead of pulling master into the cfs branch, I rather switch to the master branch and pull the cfs branch into that, it works. ah! Could you please do a git-diff between the broken and the working tree, to see what got mismerged? Ingo -

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread James Cloos
| git checkout -b git checkout -b cfs v2.6.21 Damn, sorry about the typo. That should of course be: #!/bin/sh git clone -l -s -n \ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git \ 2.6.21-cfs-master cd 2.6.21-cfs-master git checkout -b cfs v2.6.21 git pull

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread James Cloos
Ingo == Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If instead of pulling master into the cfs branch, I rather switch to the master branch and pull the cfs branch into that, it works. Ingo ah! Could you please do a git-diff between the broken and the working Ingo tree, to see what got mismerged?

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread Paolo Ciarrocchi
On 5/7/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The main goal of CFS is to implement desktop scheduling with as high quality as technically possible.) The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be downloaded

RE: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v10

2007-05-07 Thread Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ingo Molnar Envoyé : 7 mai 2007 12:34 i'm pleased to announce release -v10 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The main goal of CFS is to implement desktop scheduling with as high quality as