* William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You also seem to be unaware of the work done by Nick Piggin in
> > nicksched. There are a lot of mutually incompatible approaches being
> > evaluated, and that's good for the future.
>
> I'd like to add in Mike Kravetz, Hubertus Franke,
* William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also seem to be unaware of the work done by Nick Piggin in
nicksched. There are a lot of mutually incompatible approaches being
evaluated, and that's good for the future.
I'd like to add in Mike Kravetz, Hubertus Franke, and Peter
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:03:46AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Clearly you have no idea what's going on, or how development is done.
> These are mutually exclusive different ideas on what constitutes an
> optimal scheduler, and not in any way improvements on the same thing,
> but total
Daniel Phillips wrote:
Hi Ingo,
I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
mind. I can't help wondering if other folks are also concerned about
this. The thing is, why don't you just send your patches to Con who
got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch of great
On 5/7/07, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ingo,
I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
mind. I can't help
wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
why don't you
just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 03:02 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
> mind. I can't help
> wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
> why don't you
> just send your patches to Con who got this
Hi Ingo,
I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
mind. I can't help
wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
why don't you
just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch of
great work, proving beyond any
Ingo Molnar elte.hu> writes:
> i'm pleased to announce release -v9 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The
> main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as high
> quality as technically possible.)
Now that Andrew decided to kick scheduler patches out of -mm, can we have for-mm
cfs
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:03:46AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Clearly you have no idea what's going on, or how development is done.
These are mutually exclusive different ideas on what constitutes an
optimal scheduler, and not in any way improvements on the same thing,
but total
Ingo Molnar mingo at elte.hu writes:
i'm pleased to announce release -v9 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The
main goal of CFS is to implement desktop scheduling with as high
quality as technically possible.)
Now that Andrew decided to kick scheduler patches out of -mm, can we have for-mm
Hi Ingo,
I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
mind. I can't help
wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
why don't you
just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch of
great work, proving beyond any
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 03:02 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Hi Ingo,
I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
mind. I can't help
wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
why don't you
just send your patches to Con who got this whole
On 5/7/07, Daniel Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo,
I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
mind. I can't help
wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
why don't you
just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling
Daniel Phillips wrote:
Hi Ingo,
I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
mind. I can't help wondering if other folks are also concerned about
this. The thing is, why don't you just send your patches to Con who
got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch of great
i'm pleased to announce release -v9 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The
main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as high
quality as technically possible.)
The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be
downloaded from the usual place:
i'm pleased to announce release -v9 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The
main goal of CFS is to implement desktop scheduling with as high
quality as technically possible.)
The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be
downloaded from the usual place:
16 matches
Mail list logo
