On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 19:47 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yeah, that's what i did in -45-01.
>
Ingo,
This build failure was reported with 45-01 by an AMD64 user. Do you
need the .config?
HOSTCC scripts/bin2c
CC arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
CHK include/asm-x86_64/offset.h
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 19:47 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
yeah, that's what i did in -45-01.
Ingo,
This build failure was reported with 45-01 by an AMD64 user. Do you
need the .config?
HOSTCC scripts/bin2c
CC arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
CHK include/asm-x86_64/offset.h
UPD
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would there be any harm with changing that to
>
> #define jbd_debug(f, a...) do {} while(0)
>
> The compiler would strip it anyway, and you wouldn't have to worry
> about your scripts removing the macro.
yeah, that's what i did in -45-01. Since
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 19:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ingo,
> >
> > It would seem that in the latest patch RT-V0.7.45-00 we have reverted
> > back to removing the define of jbd_debug which the attached patch
> > (against one of the 2.6.11
* K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> It would seem that in the latest patch RT-V0.7.45-00 we have reverted
> back to removing the define of jbd_debug which the attached patch
> (against one of the 2.6.11 versions) fixed.
> +#define jbd_debug(f, a...) /**/
oops, indeed.
Ingo,
It would seem that in the latest patch RT-V0.7.45-00 we have reverted
back to removing the define of jbd_debug which the attached patch
(against one of the 2.6.11 versions) fixed.
--
kr
--- linux-2.6.11/include/linux/jbd.h.orig 2005-03-16 09:18:51.0
-0600
+++
Ingo,
It would seem that in the latest patch RT-V0.7.45-00 we have reverted
back to removing the define of jbd_debug which the attached patch
(against one of the 2.6.11 versions) fixed.
--
kr
--- linux-2.6.11/include/linux/jbd.h.orig 2005-03-16 09:18:51.0
-0600
+++
* K.R. Foley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo,
It would seem that in the latest patch RT-V0.7.45-00 we have reverted
back to removing the define of jbd_debug which the attached patch
(against one of the 2.6.11 versions) fixed.
+#define jbd_debug(f, a...) /**/
oops, indeed. '/**/'
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 19:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* K.R. Foley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo,
It would seem that in the latest patch RT-V0.7.45-00 we have reverted
back to removing the define of jbd_debug which the attached patch
(against one of the 2.6.11 versions) fixed.
* Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would there be any harm with changing that to
#define jbd_debug(f, a...) do {} while(0)
The compiler would strip it anyway, and you wouldn't have to worry
about your scripts removing the macro.
yeah, that's what i did in -45-01. Since it's not
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:26 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
Meh, I'll try again, maybe it's some weird NFS problem.
Lee
Hmm. Maybe. I should probably mention that I am doing an FC3 install via
NFS from my older SMP system right now while also building V0.7.44-03.
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:26 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > Meh, I'll try again, maybe it's some weird NFS problem.
> >
> > Lee
> >
>
> Hmm. Maybe. I should probably mention that I am doing an FC3 install via
> NFS from my older SMP system right now while also building
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:15 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Our first victim!! :-)
No kidding!?
V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
errors.
I must be in the twilight zone
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:15 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> >
> >>>Our first victim!! :-)
> >>>
> >>
> >>No kidding!?
> >>
> >
> >
> > V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
> >
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> > Our first victim!! :-)
> >
>
> No kidding!?
>
V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
errors.
I get these errors with "make oldconfig":
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf -o
> Our first victim!! :-)
>
No kidding!?
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 20:06 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>> >
>> I'm having plenty of this on boot, on my SMP/HT desktop (P4/x86), while
>> running RT-V0.7.44-01 (SMP+PREEMPT_RT):
>>
>> BUG: kstopmachine: RT task yield()-ing!
>>
>> See sample
Our first victim!! :-)
No kidding!?
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 20:06 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
I'm having plenty of this on boot, on my SMP/HT desktop (P4/x86), while
running RT-V0.7.44-01 (SMP+PREEMPT_RT):
BUG: kstopmachine: RT task yield()-ing!
See sample dmesg and .config on
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Our first victim!! :-)
No kidding!?
V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
errors.
I get these errors with make oldconfig:
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf -o
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:15 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Our first victim!! :-)
No kidding!?
V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
errors.
I must be in the
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:15 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Our first victim!! :-)
No kidding!?
V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
errors.
I must be in the twilight zone
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:26 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
Meh, I'll try again, maybe it's some weird NFS problem.
Lee
Hmm. Maybe. I should probably mention that I am doing an FC3 install via
NFS from my older SMP system right now while also building V0.7.44-03.
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:26 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
Meh, I'll try again, maybe it's some weird NFS problem.
Lee
Hmm. Maybe. I should probably mention that I am doing an FC3 install via
NFS from my older SMP system right now while also building V0.7.44-03.
Our first victim!! :-)
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 20:06 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> >
> I'm having plenty of this on boot, on my SMP/HT desktop (P4/x86), while
> running RT-V0.7.44-01 (SMP+PREEMPT_RT):
>
> BUG: kstopmachine: RT task yield()-ing!
>
> See sample dmesg and .config on attach.
>
> i have released the -V0.7.44-00 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
> downloaded from the usual place:
>
>http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
I'm having plenty of this on boot, on my SMP/HT desktop (P4/x86), while
running RT-V0.7.44-01 (SMP+PREEMPT_RT):
BUG:
i have released the -V0.7.44-00 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
downloaded from the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
this is a merge of -43-08 to 2.6.12-rc2.
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.11.tar.bz2
i have released the -V0.7.44-00 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
downloaded from the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
I'm having plenty of this on boot, on my SMP/HT desktop (P4/x86), while
running RT-V0.7.44-01 (SMP+PREEMPT_RT):
BUG: kstopmachine:
Our first victim!! :-)
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 20:06 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
I'm having plenty of this on boot, on my SMP/HT desktop (P4/x86), while
running RT-V0.7.44-01 (SMP+PREEMPT_RT):
BUG: kstopmachine: RT task yield()-ing!
See sample dmesg and .config on attach.
i have released the -V0.7.44-00 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
downloaded from the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
this is a merge of -43-08 to 2.6.12-rc2.
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.11.tar.bz2
28 matches
Mail list logo