On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:04:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:50:33 +
>
> > The only non-kernel user of this known to me is silo, which should just
> > have it's own header documenting the solaris sparc ufs variant it
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:50:33 +
> The only non-kernel user of this known to me is silo, which should just
> have it's own header documenting the solaris sparc ufs variant it needs
> to understand, possibly by using a copy of the kernel version at
From: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:50:33 +
The only non-kernel user of this known to me is silo, which should just
have it's own header documenting the solaris sparc ufs variant it needs
to understand, possibly by using a copy of the kernel version at any
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:04:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:50:33 +
The only non-kernel user of this known to me is silo, which should just
have it's own header documenting the solaris sparc ufs variant it needs
to
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 04:02:42AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> But userspace anyway can't use them since it doesn't know what "uspi"
> is, so you should better reduce the userspace visibility of this header.
We had this come up before and the header should not be exported to
userspace at all.
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:51:40PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Fix the ufs_inotofsba macro to use __u64 rather than u64 since this is
> exported to userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/ufs_fs.h b/include/linux/ufs_fs.h
> index
Fix the ufs_inotofsba macro to use __u64 rather than u64 since this is
exported to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/ufs_fs.h b/include/linux/ufs_fs.h
index 10b854d..35b6e59 100644
--- a/include/linux/ufs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/ufs_fs.h
Fix the ufs_inotofsba macro to use __u64 rather than u64 since this is
exported to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/include/linux/ufs_fs.h b/include/linux/ufs_fs.h
index 10b854d..35b6e59 100644
--- a/include/linux/ufs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/ufs_fs.h
@@
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:51:40PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Fix the ufs_inotofsba macro to use __u64 rather than u64 since this is
exported to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/include/linux/ufs_fs.h b/include/linux/ufs_fs.h
index
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 04:02:42AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
But userspace anyway can't use them since it doesn't know what uspi
is, so you should better reduce the userspace visibility of this header.
We had this come up before and the header should not be exported to
userspace at all. It
10 matches
Mail list logo