Stas, Petr,
I know it's been a while since this was discussed and integrated into
mainline, but I just now came across this, and following all of the
original discussion that I was able to locate I didn't see any mention
of a potential different approach to solving the problem which, as it
would
Stas, Petr,
I know it's been a while since this was discussed and integrated into
mainline, but I just now came across this, and following all of the
original discussion that I was able to locate I didn't see any mention
of a potential different approach to solving the problem which, as it
would
Hello.
Andrew Morton wrote:
I added this patch to -mm.
Many thanks!
Alan, sorry for bothering you with that.
- If the patch patches something which is in Linus's kernel, prepare a
diff against Linus's latest kernel.
- If the patch patches something which is only in -mm, prepare a patch
Hello.
Andrew Morton wrote:
I added this patch to -mm.
Many thanks!
Alan, sorry for bothering you with that.
- If the patch patches something which is in Linus's kernel, prepare a
diff against Linus's latest kernel.
- If the patch patches something which is only in -mm, prepare a patch
Stas Sergeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >> Alan, can you please apply that to an -ac
> >> tree?
> > Ask Andrew Morton as it belongs in the -mm tree
> Actually I tried that already.
I added this patch to -mm.
> Andrew
> had nothing against that patch personally,
> as
Hi!
Alan Cox wrote:
Alan, can you please apply that to an -ac
tree?
Ask Andrew Morton as it belongs in the -mm tree
Actually I tried that already. Andrew
had nothing against that patch personally,
as well as Linus, but after all that didn't
work:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/3/260
So it can't be
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:06:36AM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Alan, can you please apply that to an -ac
> tree?
Ask Andrew Morton as it belongs in the -mm tree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:06:36AM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
Alan, can you please apply that to an -ac
tree?
Ask Andrew Morton as it belongs in the -mm tree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
Hi!
Alan Cox wrote:
Alan, can you please apply that to an -ac
tree?
Ask Andrew Morton as it belongs in the -mm tree
Actually I tried that already. Andrew
had nothing against that patch personally,
as well as Linus, but after all that didn't
work:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/3/260
So it can't be
Stas Sergeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
Alan, can you please apply that to an -ac
tree?
Ask Andrew Morton as it belongs in the -mm tree
Actually I tried that already.
I added this patch to -mm.
Andrew
had nothing against that patch personally,
as well as Linus,
Hello.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I think Pavel missed the fact that you have to check the VM86 bit in
Ah, thanks, I must have forgotten the
essentials of the own patch :(
That said, the "ldt_ss" case should be moved _after_ the conditional
tests, since most CPU's out there will do static prediction
Hello.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I think Pavel missed the fact that you have to check the VM86 bit in
Ah, thanks, I must have forgotten the
essentials of the own patch :(
That said, the ldt_ss case should be moved _after_ the conditional
tests, since most CPU's out there will do static prediction
12 matches
Mail list logo
