Re: [patch -mm] x86_64: fake numa cmdline flag fix

2007-03-02 Thread Badari Pulavarty
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 09:03 -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > Make sure we only reference 'cmdline' on CONFIG_NUMA_EMU. > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fixes the compile problem. So does the moving char *cmdline __initdata; out of CONFIG_NUMA_EMU. But I guess your is a

[patch -mm] x86_64: fake numa cmdline flag fix

2007-03-02 Thread David Rientjes
Make sure we only reference 'cmdline' on CONFIG_NUMA_EMU. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c | 16 +++- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c --- a/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c

[patch -mm] x86_64: fake numa cmdline flag fix

2007-03-02 Thread David Rientjes
Make sure we only reference 'cmdline' on CONFIG_NUMA_EMU. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c | 16 +++- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c --- a/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c

Re: [patch -mm] x86_64: fake numa cmdline flag fix

2007-03-02 Thread Badari Pulavarty
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 09:03 -0800, David Rientjes wrote: Make sure we only reference 'cmdline' on CONFIG_NUMA_EMU. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fixes the compile problem. So does the moving char *cmdline __initdata; out of CONFIG_NUMA_EMU. But I guess your is a cleaner