Oren Laadan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Two comments:
>
> 1) Does it ever make any sense to clone the IPC namespace *without* doing
> so also for the MQ namespace or vice versa ? Unless there is a good
> reason for doing so, a single CLONE_IPCMQ flag would suffice.
SYSVIPC and POSIX IPC are di
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>> Index: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/include/linux/sched.h
>>> ===
>>> --- 2.6.24-rc3-mm2.orig/include/linux/sched.h
>>> +++ 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/include/linux/sched.h
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>> #define CLONE_NEWUSER
Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch includes the mqueue namespace in the nsproxy object. It
> also adds the support of unshare() and clone() with a new clone flag
> CLONE_NEWMQ (1 bit left in the clone flags !)
>
> CLONE_NEWMQ
Quoting Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:28:28 +0100 Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >> Index: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/include/linux/sched.h
> > >> ===
> > >> --- 2.6.24-rc3-mm2.orig/include/linux/s
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:28:28 +0100 Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Index: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/include/linux/sched.h
> >> ===
> >> --- 2.6.24-rc3-mm2.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> >> +++ 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/include/linux/sched.h
>> Index: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/include/linux/sched.h
>> ===
>> --- 2.6.24-rc3-mm2.orig/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>> #define CLONE_NEWUSER 0x1000 /* New user
>> Index: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/kernel/fork.c
>> ===
>> --- 2.6.24-rc3-mm2.orig/kernel/fork.c
>> +++ 2.6.24-rc3-mm2/kernel/fork.c
>> @@ -1004,6 +1004,13 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
>> if ((clone_flags & CLONE_SIGHAND) &&
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch includes the mqueue namespace in the nsproxy object. It
> also adds the support of unshare() and clone() with a new clone flag
> CLONE_NEWMQ (1 bit left in the clone flags !)
>
> CLONE_NEWMQ is required to be c
8 matches
Mail list logo