Re: [patch 0/4] make pr_debug() dynamic

2008-02-11 Thread Jason Baron
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:21:58PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> > >> What's wrong with klogd -c 8 or equivalent? > > > >Setting the loglevel higher, will not make pr_debug() calls visible. The only > >way to make them visible right now, is by re-compiling the kernel. > > pr_debug() was IMHO

Re: [patch 0/4] make pr_debug() dynamic

2008-02-09 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Feb 8 2008 10:52, Jason Baron wrote: >On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:03 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > make the pr_debug() function dependent upon the new immediate >> > infrastruture. >> >> What's wrong with klogd -c 8 or equivalent?

Re: [patch 0/4] make pr_debug() dynamic

2008-02-08 Thread Jason Baron
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:03 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > make the pr_debug() function dependent upon the new immediate infrastruture. > > What's wrong with klogd -c 8 or equivalent? > > Setting the loglevel higher, will not make pr

Re: [patch 0/4] make pr_debug() dynamic

2008-02-07 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:03 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > make the pr_debug() function dependent upon the new immediate infrastruture. What's wrong with klogd -c 8 or equivalent? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED

[patch 0/4] make pr_debug() dynamic

2008-02-07 Thread Jason Baron
hi, make the pr_debug() function dependent upon the new immediate infrastruture. Thus, b/c of the low runtime impact, we can dynamically enable/disable pr_debug withoug recompiling. Patch allows 'pr_debug=0/1' on the command line or via /proc/sys/debug/pr_debug. thanks, -Jason -- To unsubscrib