On Wednesday 09 January 2008 03:18:46 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * DM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 3:26 PM, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Why use sprintf? If a module name contains the % character we could
> > > > overflow the buffer. Or is module-unloading
* DM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 3:26 PM, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Why use sprintf? If a module name contains the % character we could
> > > overflow the buffer. Or is module-unloading root-only and we don't
> > > care?
> >
> > module loading isn't
On Jan 8, 2008 3:26 PM, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Why use sprintf? If a module name contains the % character we could
> > overflow the buffer. Or is module-unloading root-only and we don't
> > care?
>
> module loading isn't just root only; the name comes from an already
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:51:37 +0100
DM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 12:19 AM, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > This patch tracks the last unloaded module, and prints this as part
> > of the module list in the oops trace.
> >
> [...]
> >}
> > + /*
On Jan 7, 2008 12:19 AM, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> This patch tracks the last unloaded module, and prints this as part of the
> module list in the oops trace.
>
[...]
>}
> + /* Store the name of the last unloaded module for diagnostic purposes
> */
> +
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 22:23:31 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Right now, only the last 1 module is tracked; I expect that this is
> > > enough for the vast majority of cases where this information
> > > matters; if it turns out that tracking more is
* Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Right now, only the last 1 module is tracked; I expect that this is
> > enough for the vast majority of cases where this information
> > matters; if it turns out that tracking more is important, we can
> > always extend it to that.
> >
> >
* Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now, only the last 1 module is tracked; I expect that this is
enough for the vast majority of cases where this information
matters; if it turns out that tracking more is important, we can
always extend it to that.
Signed-off-by: Arjan
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 22:23:31 Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now, only the last 1 module is tracked; I expect that this is
enough for the vast majority of cases where this information
matters; if it turns out that tracking more is important, we
On Jan 7, 2008 12:19 AM, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
This patch tracks the last unloaded module, and prints this as part of the
module list in the oops trace.
[...]
}
+ /* Store the name of the last unloaded module for diagnostic purposes
*/
+
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:51:37 +0100
DM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 12:19 AM, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
This patch tracks the last unloaded module, and prints this as part
of the module list in the oops trace.
[...]
}
+ /* Store the name of
On Jan 8, 2008 3:26 PM, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use sprintf? If a module name contains the % character we could
overflow the buffer. Or is module-unloading root-only and we don't
care?
module loading isn't just root only; the name comes from an already loaded
* DM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 3:26 PM, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use sprintf? If a module name contains the % character we could
overflow the buffer. Or is module-unloading root-only and we don't
care?
module loading isn't just root only; the
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 03:18:46 Ingo Molnar wrote:
* DM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 3:26 PM, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use sprintf? If a module name contains the % character we could
overflow the buffer. Or is module-unloading root-only and we don't
On Monday 07 January 2008 10:19:46 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Subject: track and print last unloaded module in the oops trace
> From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Based on a suggestion from Andi:
> In various cases,
Subject: track and print last unloaded module in the oops trace
From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on a suggestion from Andi:
In various cases, the unload of a module may leave some bad state around
that causes a
Subject: track and print last unloaded module in the oops trace
From: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on a suggestion from Andi:
In various cases, the unload of a module may leave some bad state around
that causes a
On Monday 07 January 2008 10:19:46 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Subject: track and print last unloaded module in the oops trace
From: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on a suggestion from Andi:
In various cases, the
18 matches
Mail list logo
