On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/10, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > +static void signalfd_put_sighand(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx,
> > +struct sighand_struct *sighand,
> > +unsigned long *flags)
> > +{
> > +
On 03/10, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> +static void signalfd_put_sighand(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx,
> + struct sighand_struct *sighand,
> + unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + unlock_task_sighand(ctx->tsk, flags);
> +}
Note that
On 03/10, Davide Libenzi wrote:
+static void signalfd_put_sighand(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx,
+ struct sighand_struct *sighand,
+ unsigned long *flags)
+{
+ unlock_task_sighand(ctx-tsk, flags);
+}
Note that signalfd_put_sighand()
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 03/10, Davide Libenzi wrote:
+static void signalfd_put_sighand(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx,
+struct sighand_struct *sighand,
+unsigned long *flags)
+{
+ unlock_task_sighand(ctx-tsk,
This patch series implements the new signalfd() system call.
I took part of the original Linus code (and you know how
badly it can be broken :), and I added even more breakage ;)
Signals are fetched from the same signal queue used by the process,
so signalfd will compete with standard kernel
This patch series implements the new signalfd() system call.
I took part of the original Linus code (and you know how
badly it can be broken :), and I added even more breakage ;)
Signals are fetched from the same signal queue used by the process,
so signalfd will compete with standard kernel
6 matches
Mail list logo
