Andrew,
On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 22:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 11/12/2020 21:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> It's not any different from the hardware example at least not as far as
>> I understood the code.
>
> Xen's event channels do have a couple of quirks.
Why am I not surprised?
> Binding an
On 11/12/2020 21:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 09:29, boris ostrovsky wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/20 7:37 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 13:10, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
> On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas
On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 09:29, boris ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/11/20 7:37 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 13:10, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Change the implementation so that
On 12/11/20 7:37 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 13:10, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
>>> On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu
On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 13:10, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
>>
>> On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
>>> percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the
On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
cpumask. That does not make sense.
The XEN
On 11.12.20 11:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 07:17, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu interrupts and
On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 07:17, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
>>
>> On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
>>> percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the
On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
cpumask. That does not make sense.
The XEN
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 18:20, boris ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
>> percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
>> cpumask. That does not make sense.
>>
>>
On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
> percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
> cpumask. That does not make sense.
>
> The XEN implementation of irqchip::irq_set_affinity()
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
cpumask. That does not make sense.
The XEN implementation of irqchip::irq_set_affinity() already picks a
single target CPU out of the affinity mask
12 matches
Mail list logo