hello Juergen,
On 12/20/07, Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:45, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> > So I am curious, if possible, user can switch softirq-threads or IRQs
> > RT tasks to non-RT tasks for slow hardware or least important hardware
> > for NON-RT
On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:45, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, Is this a serious requirement? Should this be possible?
>
> I have noticed this problem:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/loadavgrt
> 1.00 1.00 1.00 0/52 1158
> [EMAIL
> By default, all softirq-threads or IRQs will be RT task but if there
> is some option user can switch it to NON-RT task then it will be good.
Okay, understood.
I will think about how to add that too. But, probably we can add it
seperately from this patchset.
Kind Regards,
Remy
2007/12/20,
Hello Remy,
On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, Is this a serious requirement? Should this be possible?
I have noticed this problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/loadavgrt
1.00 1.00 1.00 0/52 1158
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/loadavg
0.00 0.00 0.02 1/52 1159
[EMAIL
Hello Jaswinder,
> Is it possible to run softirq-threads or IRQs as a non-realtime tasks
> in RT kernel.
Currently the answer is no. (Unless overruled from userspace) I did
not take this requirement into account.
So, Is this a serious requirement? Should this be possible?
I cannot imagine a
On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The RT-patch originally creates all its softirq-threads at
> priority 50.
Is it possible to run softirq-threads or IRQs as a non-realtime tasks
in RT kernel.
If yes, then how.
Thank you,
Jaswinder Singh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The RT-patch originally creates all its softirq-threads at
priority 50.
Is it possible to run softirq-threads or IRQs as a non-realtime tasks
in RT kernel.
If yes, then how.
Thank you,
Jaswinder Singh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hello Jaswinder,
Is it possible to run softirq-threads or IRQs as a non-realtime tasks
in RT kernel.
Currently the answer is no. (Unless overruled from userspace) I did
not take this requirement into account.
So, Is this a serious requirement? Should this be possible?
I cannot imagine a
Hello Remy,
On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Is this a serious requirement? Should this be possible?
I have noticed this problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/loadavgrt
1.00 1.00 1.00 0/52 1158
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/loadavg
0.00 0.00 0.02 1/52 1159
[EMAIL
By default, all softirq-threads or IRQs will be RT task but if there
is some option user can switch it to NON-RT task then it will be good.
Okay, understood.
I will think about how to add that too. But, probably we can add it
seperately from this patchset.
Kind Regards,
Remy
2007/12/20,
On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:45, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Is this a serious requirement? Should this be possible?
I have noticed this problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/loadavgrt
1.00 1.00 1.00 0/52 1158
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat
hello Juergen,
On 12/20/07, Juergen Beisert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:45, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
So I am curious, if possible, user can switch softirq-threads or IRQs
RT tasks to non-RT tasks for slow hardware or least important hardware
for NON-RT tasks. So
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:45:54 +0100 Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 11 +++
> kernel/softirq.c| 105
> ++--
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> Index:
The RT-patch originally creates all its softirq-threads at
priority 50. Of course, this is not a usable default for many
realtime systems and therefor these priorities has to be tuneable
for each RT-system. But, currently there is no way within the
kernel to adjust this to the needs of the user.
The RT-patch originally creates all its softirq-threads at
priority 50. Of course, this is not a usable default for many
realtime systems and therefor these priorities has to be tuneable
for each RT-system. But, currently there is no way within the
kernel to adjust this to the needs of the user.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:45:54 +0100 Remy Bohmer wrote:
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 11 +++
kernel/softirq.c| 105
++--
2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Index:
16 matches
Mail list logo
