On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:22:12PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:20:14PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:22:12PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:20:14PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:20:14PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > @@ -123,9 +129,39 @@
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:20:14PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
@@ -123,9 +129,39 @@ static void
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > > emptied out their page
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > > emptied out their page
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:57:14AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Not at this time, I'll try to look into that. For now, I am updating
> the patch to revert the shrinker back to DEFAULT_SEEKS and change the
> object count to only include objects above a certain threshold, which
> assumes a
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:57:14AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Not at this time, I'll try to look into that. For now, I am updating
the patch to revert the shrinker back to DEFAULT_SEEKS and change the
object count to only include objects above a certain threshold, which
assumes a
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 02:06:07PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:50:17AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:50:17AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:50:17AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 02:06:07PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:50:17AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > + /* Only shadow
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > + /* Only shadow entries in there, keep track of this node */
> > > + if (!(node->count &
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
+ /* Only shadow entries in there, keep track of this node */
+ if (!(node-count
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
+ /* Only shadow entries in
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:55:01PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> On 01/11/2014 02:10 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which are
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:55:01PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
Hi Johannes,
On 01/11/2014 02:10 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is
Hi Johannes,
On 01/11/2014 02:10 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This is
Hi Johannes,
On 01/11/2014 02:10 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is
On 01/10/2014 01:10 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a
On 01/10/2014 01:10 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:10:52AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:21:48PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:21:48PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:21:48PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:10:52AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:21:48PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 06:00:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:29:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:29:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > Previously, page cache
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > > emptied out their page
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:13:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:38:28 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:13:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:38:28 -0500 Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:29:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 06:00:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:29:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:38:28 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This is
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:38:28 -0500 Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote:
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a
58 matches
Mail list logo
