Re: [patch v2 6/6] cgroup: remove css_get_next

2012-11-30 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 30-11-12 13:12:29, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > (2012/11/27 3:47), Michal Hocko wrote: > > Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is > > no need to keep css_get_next in the place. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko > > Hm, then, the next think will be css_is_an

Re: [patch v2 6/6] cgroup: remove css_get_next

2012-11-29 Thread Kamezawa Hiroyuki
(2012/11/27 3:47), Michal Hocko wrote: > Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is > no need to keep css_get_next in the place. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Hm, then, the next think will be css_is_ancestor() etc.. Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki -- To unsubscribe

[patch v2 6/6] cgroup: remove css_get_next

2012-11-26 Thread Michal Hocko
Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is no need to keep css_get_next in the place. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko --- include/linux/cgroup.h |7 --- kernel/cgroup.c| 49 2 files changed, 56 deletions(-