On Fri 30-11-12 13:12:29, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2012/11/27 3:47), Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is
> > no need to keep css_get_next in the place.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
>
> Hm, then, the next think will be css_is_an
(2012/11/27 3:47), Michal Hocko wrote:
> Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is
> no need to keep css_get_next in the place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Hm, then, the next think will be css_is_ancestor() etc..
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
--
To unsubscribe
Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is
no need to keep css_get_next in the place.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
---
include/linux/cgroup.h |7 ---
kernel/cgroup.c| 49
2 files changed, 56 deletions(-
3 matches
Mail list logo