On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:59:35PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 19:20:02 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:39:12PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >> RISC-V: Remove smb_mb__{before,after}_spinlock()
> >
> >I wonder whether you really
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:59:35PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 19:20:02 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:39:12PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >> RISC-V: Remove smb_mb__{before,after}_spinlock()
> >
> >I wonder whether you really
On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 19:20:02 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:39:12PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
RISC-V: Remove smb_mb__{before,after}_spinlock()
I wonder whether you really meant to remove smp_mb__after_spinlock():
on the one hand, this primitive
On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 19:20:02 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:39:12PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
RISC-V: Remove smb_mb__{before,after}_spinlock()
I wonder whether you really meant to remove smp_mb__after_spinlock():
on the one hand, this primitive
4 matches
Mail list logo