LOL, I'm in Sunnyvale, CA right now. I work for Ensim.Com.
OK, here is all the technical info on my box. Sorry it took so long to
respond. Had a department meeting to attend.
MSI 694D Pro running Dual FC-PGA PIII-733 CPUs with 1GB of Corsair RAM.
HDD is a Western Digital WDC300BB-00AU1 ATA1
Where the flip are you form this power starved portion of the world?
Also the subject is AMD and VIA chipsets not AMD CPU's running on VIA
chipsets.
What chipset or host is causing you the problem?
VIA pr Promise?
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote:
>
>
> OK, I see you guys releas
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:54:36PM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote:
>
>
> OK, I see you guys releasing patches for the AMD + VIA problem, but this
> problem is NOT just limited to the AMD problem. I'm using Intel PIII-733s
> and the VIA VT82C686A chipset. No AMD CPUs in ANY of my VIA boxes. When
OK, I see you guys releasing patches for the AMD + VIA problem, but this
problem is NOT just limited to the AMD problem. I'm using Intel PIII-733s
and the VIA VT82C686A chipset. No AMD CPUs in ANY of my VIA boxes. When
are we going to see something for the MSI boards?
My board in particular is
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:58:09PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> In the past there were hardcoded timing values for the allowable for the
> VIA cores that were defined by VIA. They were taken from their internal
> lookup tables. You have stated that you have allowed for "slop" in the
> timing t
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:04:50AM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> > > Well, I know this. But I fear hardcoded timings won't really help here,
> > > unless everyone out there ran their chipsets at 33 MHz, in which case the
> >
> > You have to run the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:04:50AM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > Well, I know this. But I fear hardcoded timings won't really help here,
> > unless everyone out there ran their chipsets at 33 MHz, in which case the
>
> You have to run the ATA Chipset at 33MHz or it will fail in 99% of all
> ca
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:57:07PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> > Vojtech, I worry that the dynamic timing that you are calculating could
> > bite you.
>
> Well, I know this. But I fear hardcoded timings won't really help here,
> unles everyone o
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > > 1. Only a software guy would call it 'bounce'.. sounds funny ;-)
>
> Er...I help design some of the hardware and the rules, so I do more than
> just software. So does 'echo' or 'reflections'sound better than 'bounce'?
Yes. (I wasn't cracking on
In another dimension, Andre Hedrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> remarked:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:42:41PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > 1. Only a software guy would call it 'bounce'.. sounds funny ;-)
>
> Er...I help design some of the hardware and the rules, so I do more than
> just soft
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:42:41PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:57:07PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > >
> > > > chipset ---\
> > > > |
> > > >
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:42:41PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:57:07PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> >
> > > chipset ---\
> > > |
> > > \-IDC-header
> > >
> > > chipset ---+
> > >
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:46:06AM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> Ok, the VIA driver from clean 2.2.18 does nothing. It doesn't even use
> hardcoded timings. It doesn't touch any timing tables. It just blindly
> enables prefetch and writeback in the chips. The thing works because it
> relies on BI
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:51:12AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:18:34 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>
>
> >that's not the topic: Andre's talking about pci-clock-based timing
> >constants the the driver programs into the ide controller - a matter
> >of an extra few/more nanoseco
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:18:34 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>that's not the topic: Andre's talking about pci-clock-based timing
>constants the the driver programs into the ide controller - a matter
>of an extra few/more nanoseconds.
I know, but when looking hard for a problem in one place and not
find
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:57:07PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> Vojtech, I worry that the dynamic timing that you are calculating could
> bite you.
Well, I know this. But I fear hardcoded timings won't really help here,
unles everyone out there ran their chipsets at 33 MHz, in which case the
c
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:57:07 -0800 (PST), Andre Hedrick wrote:
...
>
>Vojtech, I worry that the dynamic timing that you are calculating could
>bite you. Timings are exact especially at modes 3/4/5 the margins go to
>an effective zero for varition or wiggle room. The state diagrams from
>Quantum
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:51:03 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
> >
> > >On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'm running with an Abit K7 (uses via82c686a in southbridge) with I
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:51:03 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Alan Chandler wrote:
> >
> >> I'm running with an Abit K7 (uses via82c686a in southbridge) with IBM
> >> deskstar 8.4gb disks (DHEA-38451) as masters in
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:51:03 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Alan Chandler wrote:
>
>> I'm running with an Abit K7 (uses via82c686a in southbridge) with IBM
>> deskstar 8.4gb disks (DHEA-38451) as masters in ide0 and 1. They only
>> do UDMA mode 2. I am not overclocking or anything
on Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:56:10 EST Vojtech Pavlik ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote
> ...
>I'm sending you (and others who might be interested) my latest VIA and
>IDE drivers. The VIA driver (v3.15) should have a complete support for
>UDMA100 on the vt82c686b chip, the AMD driver (v1.5) should have full
Hi Andre!
I'm sending you (and others who might be interested) my latest VIA and
IDE drivers. The VIA driver (v3.15) should have a complete support for
UDMA100 on the vt82c686b chip, the AMD driver (v1.5) should have full
UDMA100 support on the amd766 ViperPlus chip.
They're also a little more f
22 matches
Mail list logo
