On Thu 2020-07-09 22:07:58, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/07/09 14:25), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Thu 2020-07-09 13:23:07, John Ogness wrote:
> > > On 2020-07-09, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > I though more about it. IMHO, it will be better to modify
> > > > prb_first_seq() to do the same cycle
On (20/07/09 14:25), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2020-07-09 13:23:07, John Ogness wrote:
> > On 2020-07-09, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > I though more about it. IMHO, it will be better to modify
> > > prb_first_seq() to do the same cycle as prb_next_seq()
> > > and return seq number of the first
On Thu 2020-07-09 13:23:07, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2020-07-09, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > I though more about it. IMHO, it will be better to modify
> > prb_first_seq() to do the same cycle as prb_next_seq()
> > and return seq number of the first valid entry.
>
> Exactly!
>
> Here is a patch that
On 2020-07-09, Petr Mladek wrote:
> I though more about it. IMHO, it will be better to modify
> prb_first_seq() to do the same cycle as prb_next_seq()
> and return seq number of the first valid entry.
Exactly!
Here is a patch that does just that. I added a prb_first_valid_seq()
function and
On Thu 2020-07-09 12:59:06, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2020-07-09 12:20:35, John Ogness wrote:
> > On 2020-07-09, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > On (20/07/09 15:14), kernel test robot wrote:
> > > [..]
> > >
> > > Took me a while to find the FAIL-ed test:
> > >
> > >> kmsg01.c:393: INFO: TEST:
On Thu 2020-07-09 12:20:35, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2020-07-09, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (20/07/09 15:14), kernel test robot wrote:
> > [..]
> >
> > Took me a while to find the FAIL-ed test:
> >
> >> kmsg01.c:393: INFO: TEST: read returns EPIPE when messages get overwritten
> >>
On 2020-07-09, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/07/09 15:14), kernel test robot wrote:
> [..]
>
> Took me a while to find the FAIL-ed test:
>
>> kmsg01.c:393: INFO: TEST: read returns EPIPE when messages get overwritten
>> kmsg01.c:398: INFO: first seqno: 0
>> kmsg01.c:411: INFO: first seqno
On (20/07/09 15:14), kernel test robot wrote:
[..]
Took me a while to find the FAIL-ed test:
> kmsg01.c:393: INFO: TEST: read returns EPIPE when messages get overwritten
> kmsg01.c:398: INFO: first seqno: 0
> kmsg01.c:411: INFO: first seqno now: 881
> kmsg01.c:425: FAIL: read returned: 77:
8 matches
Mail list logo