Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: add hym8563 binding

2013-12-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:46:11PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 14:41:10 schrieb Mark Brown: > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible: should be: "haoyu,hym8563" > > > +- reg: i2c address > > >

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: add hym8563 binding

2013-12-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:46:11PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 14:41:10 schrieb Mark Brown: On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: +Required properties: +- compatible: should be: haoyu,hym8563 +- reg: i2c address +- gpios: alarm

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: add hym8563 binding

2013-12-07 Thread Heiko Stübner
Hi Mark, Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 14:41:10 schrieb Mark Brown: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > +Required properties: > > +- compatible: should be: "haoyu,hym8563" > > +- reg: i2c address > > +- gpios: alarm interrupt gpio > > Why is this specified as a

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: add hym8563 binding

2013-12-07 Thread Heiko Stübner
Hi Mark, Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 14:41:10 schrieb Mark Brown: On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: +Required properties: +- compatible: should be: haoyu,hym8563 +- reg: i2c address +- gpios: alarm interrupt gpio Why is this specified as a GPIO and not as

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: add hym8563 binding

2013-12-02 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > +Required properties: > +- compatible: should be: "haoyu,hym8563" > +- reg: i2c address > +- gpios: alarm interrupt gpio Why is this specified as a GPIO and not as an interrupt? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: add hym8563 binding

2013-12-02 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: +Required properties: +- compatible: should be: haoyu,hym8563 +- reg: i2c address +- gpios: alarm interrupt gpio Why is this specified as a GPIO and not as an interrupt? signature.asc Description: Digital signature