On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:46:11PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 14:41:10 schrieb Mark Brown:
> > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > +Required properties:
> > > +- compatible: should be: "haoyu,hym8563"
> > > +- reg: i2c address
> > >
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:46:11PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 14:41:10 schrieb Mark Brown:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be: haoyu,hym8563
+- reg: i2c address
+- gpios: alarm
Hi Mark,
Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 14:41:10 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: should be: "haoyu,hym8563"
> > +- reg: i2c address
> > +- gpios: alarm interrupt gpio
>
> Why is this specified as a
Hi Mark,
Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 14:41:10 schrieb Mark Brown:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be: haoyu,hym8563
+- reg: i2c address
+- gpios: alarm interrupt gpio
Why is this specified as a GPIO and not as
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be: "haoyu,hym8563"
> +- reg: i2c address
> +- gpios: alarm interrupt gpio
Why is this specified as a GPIO and not as an interrupt?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:47:42PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be: haoyu,hym8563
+- reg: i2c address
+- gpios: alarm interrupt gpio
Why is this specified as a GPIO and not as an interrupt?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
6 matches
Mail list logo