On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:52:56PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm cc'ing a few se
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 05.06.14 20:01, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>
>> > Hmm? You should "exec" the real daemon binary at the end, not just fork
>> > it off. That wait the shell script process is replaced by the daemon
>> > binary, whic
On Thu, 05.06.14 20:01, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
> > Hmm? You should "exec" the real daemon binary at the end, not just fork
> > it off. That wait the shell script process is replaced by the daemon
> > binary, which is what you want.
>
> I tried both just running it and also run
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:22:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 05.06.14 02:31, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Thu, 05.06.14 02:31, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
> >
> > > I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas
> > > he
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>>
>> > I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
>> > in particula
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>
> > I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
> > in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives on
On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
> I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
> in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives on the
> ExecStart= line of a systemd service unit file, alternative ideas are
8 matches
Mail list logo