--- Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
> It can be re-added at any time when an in-kernel
> user comes.
>
> But the most interesting question is:
> Why is noone interested in getting his TIPC using
> drivers merged?
>
I don't think lack of interest is the issue here. The
users I know
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:19:19PM -0800, Stephens, Allan wrote:
>...
> 2) There are portions of TIPC's native API which are intended for use by
> driver programmers, but which are not being used by any code that is
> currently in the kernel. While removing these API's from TIPC will only
>
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:19:19PM -0800, Stephens, Allan wrote:
...
2) There are portions of TIPC's native API which are intended for use by
driver programmers, but which are not being used by any code that is
currently in the kernel. While removing these API's from TIPC will only
impact
--- Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
It can be re-added at any time when an in-kernel
user comes.
But the most interesting question is:
Why is noone interested in getting his TIPC using
drivers merged?
I don't think lack of interest is the issue here. The
users I know anything
tephens, Allan;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/tipc/:
> possible cleanups
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:06:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >My impression is that
@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/tipc/:
possible cleanups
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:06:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
My impression is that most of this might have users that are not
yet submitted for inclusion
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:06:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >My impression is that most of this might have users that are not yet
> > >submitted for inclusion in the kernel - one year after TIPC was merged.
> > >
> > >
> > Not quite. The exported symbols belong to a public API for driver
>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 04:08:08PM +, Jon Maloy wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
> >- make needlessly global functions static
> >- #if 0 unused functions
> >
> >
> Thanks. I think most of those were due for our next release, anyway. But
>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 04:08:08PM +, Jon Maloy wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make needlessly global functions static
- #if 0 unused functions
Thanks. I think most of those were due for our next release, anyway. But
we'll
get it
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:06:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
My impression is that most of this might have users that are not yet
submitted for inclusion in the kernel - one year after TIPC was merged.
Not quite. The exported symbols belong to a public API for driver
programmers.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make needlessly global functions static
- #if 0 unused functions
Thanks. I think most of those were due for our next release, anyway. But
we'll
get it in, one way or another.
- remove all EXPORT_SYMBOL's
My
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make needlessly global functions static
- #if 0 unused functions
Thanks. I think most of those were due for our next release, anyway. But
we'll
get it in, one way or another.
- remove all EXPORT_SYMBOL's
My
12 matches
Mail list logo
