Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] um: link with -lpthread

2015-12-31 Thread Thomas Meyer
Am 31.12.2015 5:06 nachm. schrieb Vegard Nossum : > > Similarly to commit fb1770aa78a43530940d0c2dd161e77bc705bdac, with gcc 5 > on Ubuntu and CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y I was seeing these linker errors: Hi, Oops, yes this patch looks good to me. Honestly I did never test the static link case.

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] um: link with -lpthread

2015-12-31 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 31.12.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Thomas Meyer: > Am 31.12.2015 5:06 nachm. schrieb Vegard Nossum : >> >> Similarly to commit fb1770aa78a43530940d0c2dd161e77bc705bdac, with gcc 5 >> on Ubuntu and CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y I was seeing these linker errors: > > Hi, > > Oops, yes this patch looks good to

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] um: link with -lpthread

2015-12-31 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 31.12.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Thomas Meyer: > Am 31.12.2015 5:06 nachm. schrieb Vegard Nossum : >> >> Similarly to commit fb1770aa78a43530940d0c2dd161e77bc705bdac, with gcc 5 >> on Ubuntu and CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y I was seeing these linker errors: > > Hi, > > Oops,

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] um: link with -lpthread

2015-12-31 Thread Thomas Meyer
Am 31.12.2015 5:06 nachm. schrieb Vegard Nossum : > > Similarly to commit fb1770aa78a43530940d0c2dd161e77bc705bdac, with gcc 5 > on Ubuntu and CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y I was seeing these linker errors: Hi, Oops, yes this patch looks good to me. Honestly I did never test